• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d be much more likely to support and sympathize with a group blowing up fossil fuel infrastructure than standing in the fucking road, blocking traffic.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The dude has a point whether we like it or not. Public support makes a difference. Losing it is a cost. Is what they’re accomplishing worth that cost?

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The clear answer is yes. This is exactly like the people who say they won’t be allies anymore if we LGBT+ people aren’t polite enough.

          No halfway decent person who isn’t a steaming pile of excrement would be deterred by such a protest. That user’s take stems from discourse specifically designed to shut down protests, and it’s imperative that we do not let it work.

          So no, the “dude” doesn’t have a “point.” It’s all horseshit. Shut them down immediately when they start flapping their pie hole with that shit.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            No halfway decent person who isn’t a steaming pile of excrement would be deterred by such a protest.

            You assume there are significantly more “halfway decent people” than “steaming piles of excrement”. If your assumption were true, we would have abandoned fossil fuels in favor of electric vehicles at least 40 years ago, and wouldn’t be having this argument today. Humanity leans far more to the “excrement” side of this particular debate.

            You need the support of quite a lot of the people you describe as “steaming piles of excrement”, and all you’re doing is driving them straight to the first politician who says “I’ll lock up every last one of these asshole protesters as soon as they step in the street” while taking the money of every oil tycoon on the planet.

            No, OP’s idea is infinitely superior to those jobless, orange-coated jackasses.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You don’t actually need public support to shut down fossil fuel infrastructure if your supporters are organized and willing to perish over it. The doomers actually do have large enough numbers that they could organize and set up their own militias if they really wanted to. Hell, the right wing nutjobs do it all the time.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Protests are supposed to raise awareness and motivate people to join their cause. These particular protests are turning away far more people from this cause than they are gaining.

            These protests are ideal for promoting stricter laws against jaywalking and unlawful detention, but not so much for reducing the use of fossil fuels.

            • set_secret@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              anyone who’s not already on board the climate change cause is either too stupid or too rich to care. neither of which can be fixed.

                  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Oh, there is no implication about it: you need one hell of a justification to deliberately infringe on freedom of movement. It should be a criminal offense on the same level as “harassment” or “simple assault” to deliberately prevent someone from traveling. Each of these protesters should be charged with a separate count for each and every vehicle so delayed.

                    And, anyone so impeded should be justified in using any force necessary to end that unlawful impediment.

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The problem is studies have demonstrated it’s counterproductive both in the popular debate and at driving policy, it can actually set back the green movement.

            Just because you agree with their idealism doesn’t mean you need to agree with their behaviour, if I burn tires to get awareness for climate change that isn’t something a sensible person supports

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, that’s an accurate summary of what I just said.

        The only thing those idiots are likely to accomplish is stronger laws against jaywalking.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When an oil refinery blows up and gasoline prices are suddenly 8x what they are now are you going to be saying “OMG why did they do this without any kind of warning”?

      Consider the possibility that blocking traffic, throwing paint on paintings and yachts, the orange dust, etc. might be a warning. If your commute is being blocked, use that time to think about what your plan will be when you can no longer afford to put gasoline in your car. Put emotion aside and think about how you would logically solve that problem. Because you might have to soon enough.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I get that you’re an asshole that doesn’t believe in anything. You just like hurting other people and pick whatever cause allows you to do so.

          Given you’re a professional asshole, why should anyone give a shit about you?

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If your commute is being blocked, use that time to think

        I use that time to think about bills classifying intentional obstruction of traffic to be unlawful detention.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’ve chosen your side in this. No one needs to feel bad about the problems it’ll cause for you if and when it comes time to start blowing up refineries.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Correct. The problems of a blown up refinery will affect the oil producers first. The problems of obstructing traffic will affect the oil producers never.

            Picket the oil infrastructure. Make it expensive and unreliable, and consumers will gravitate away from it. The problems it will cause are not a big, but a feature.

            • snowbell@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It could be said that blocking traffic benefits oil producers by increasing gasoline usage and making people less sympathetic to the cause against them. Wasn’t there a case of someone in the oil industry paying people to protest in a similarly asinine way?

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Haha so you’re a racist asshole that expects people to be sympathetic to your personal hardships? You don’t deserve any sympathy.

    • FrankHerbert@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Until gasoline became unavailable (while still being needed by billions of people) because of terrorism instead of a more reasonable approach.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gasoline won’t become unavailable. There is too much redundancy built into the production and distribution networks.

        What would happen is the price of gasoline would rise, which would further drive electric vehicle adoption.

        OP’s approach is infinitely superior to harassing drivers directly.

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oil prices rising won’t just affect cars that run on petroleum products. All your electricity bill will probably rise as well unless power in your area is 100% provided by renewable energy.

          Even then, most renewable energy still rely on fossil fuel to run the vehicles for transporting and maintaining their infrastructure, so now even that cost would sharply increase.

          Talking about EVs, just which EV companies have eliminated the involvement of any fossil fuel in their supply line? Unless we have enough of these supply lines, EV prices will also increase for the majority of people.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Very few electric plants burn petroleum products. Fossil fuel plants typically burn either coal or natural gas, neither of which would be significantly affected by disruption of oil-based infrastructure.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        🤔 Okay, let’s hack the banks, redistribute all of the money electronically and then pay for electric infrastructure ourselves.