The admins gave me and others the decision. I didn’t ask for this.

As such, I decided to go with the least amount of headache, and have removed him from communities I am top moderator of. @jordanlund@lemmy.world is free to re-apply, and I will gladly discuss this.

The admins decided this without actually discussing this with me. They merely reminded me that as top moderator I had the power to remove moderators beneath me. They never mentioned to me that I would be taking on the role of top moderator of other communities until I was made aware of this post and the update.

The admins on NUMEROUS occasions have had no issues stepping in and moderating on our behalf, without discussion. The fact they want to defer now is odd, as this is a first-time occurrence.

I just didn’t want to be the final decider of a bigger topic.

This may be the final straw that breaks this camel’s back. I’m not sure how much more BS I can deal with.

No. I was merely reminded that as top moderator, I could remove Jordan Lund. I said then, and still say that I had no reason to remove him.

The fact that their decision was basically “It’s on you, we’re done here” was unwelcome.

This caught me by surprise, to put it mildly.

Still deciding on my path forward.

That almost flew over my head

HONK!

This comment was reported as homophobic.

I believe the meaning of the comment to be

Republicans projecting - again

Leaving it up for @Korkki@lemmy.ml to clarify.

I have worked for non-profits.

They are completely allowed to make a profit.

You are mistakenly under the impression that I’m against Mozilla.

If you go back to my original comment, I merely explained what I explained here. Mozilla is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

You decided to take that as an attack on Mozilla, for some strange reason, and attacked me. I just turned that same energy back on you.

Did I ever attack Mozilla? Did you attack me?

I couldn’t agree more

I only use Firefox. I’ve only used Firefox since 2000.

They, by their own statements, are a 501( C )3, which is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

Sit down.

Non-profit isn’t the same as not-for-profit

Take American Red Cross

They make bank on blood donations. Also, they take in way more than they put out.

non-exclusive

That means we can license all our content to another company, and Reddit would be forced to allow them to fetch it, as we still own it, right?

You bitch about Chicago Pizza? Fucking CHICAGO?!?

Let me introduce you to the abomination I’m trying to eliminate: Quad Cities Pizza

They are called TOPPINGS. toppings, not middleings, for the love of all things just and right.

Seriously impressed your still doing this

It actually is.

“I never consent to searches”

“I don’t answer questions. Am I detained, or am I free to leave?”

Crossover:

1 with 3

2 with 6

Not as much as you’d think.

Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran

• https://hilariouschaos.com/u/universalmonk
• https://futurology.today/u/universalmonk
• https://lemdro.id/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.radio/u/universalmonk
• https://eviltoast.org/u/universalmonk
• https://sh.itjust.works/u/universalmonk
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/swp
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/pierpontctc
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/politicsunfiltered
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/solarpunkstrength
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/fitchicks
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/lostscreams
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/libertariansocialism
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/esperanto
• https://slrpnk.net/u/universalmonk
  • https://slrpnk.net/c/solarpunkstrength
• https://mander.xyz/u/universalmonk
• https://midwest.social/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://midwest.social/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
• https://lemm.ee/u/universalmonk
  • https://lemm.ee/c/talesfromthedark
  • https://lemm.ee/c/swp
  • https://lemm.ee/c/pierpontctc
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byupathway
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemm.ee/c/politicsunfiltered
• https://beehaw.org/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
• https://lemmy.world/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/politicsunfiltered (TAKEN OVER BY ANOTHER MOD)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/PierpontCTC
  • https://lemmy.world/c/transracial
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byupathway
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemmy.world/c/swp
  • https://lemmy.world/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://lemmy.world/c/amileaday
  • https://lemmy.world/c/murderhornet_100

After reviewing the actual legal filing, you’re correct. I somehow missed that.

All persons (corporate or individual) in the United States who participated in an Affiliate Program with a United States online merchant and had affiliate attribution redirected to Paypal as a result of the Honey browser extension.

Thanks for the clarification.

The YouTubers can only sue for actual damages THEY realized.

As the class is for content creators that partnered with Honey, it can only be for the affiliate links.

Users will need to sue separately, either individually or as a different class. My money is on them having a forced arbitration clause, so direct lawsuit will most likely be out of the question.

It’s a neat idea, but why not ncdu?