Can’t argue with that logic.

Your last statement “have to tell everyone”, is part of the problem.

When you deal with secrets you learn to not tell anyone. They look for people that don’t have that desire. Also they keep things compartmentalized.

if her dad was black that she is at least half black… it depends on what her mom was. if she was black then the daughter is black. if her mom was anything else that she’s 50% black and if she wants to call herself black at that point then i do not care.

Your answer in your edit is actually a pretty good answer

So which countries are on the list?

It’s a good question. I honestly don’t have an answer. If a person wakes up one day and says hey, that’s what I want to do. Who are we to judge it?

A good attorney/a smart attorney is going to directly ask their client if they actually did it. There is 0% chance you can really defend your client if you don’t know if they did it or not. Because if you don’t know if they did , that means you also won’t have access to all of the information that the other side will have. And then you can pretty much guarantee a failure. By failure, I mean, having the Defendant wind up in jail.

And yes, I know the old statement of every pedophile should be in jail in every rapist should be in jail. But from the defense attorneys point of view, if your client winds up in prison, then you failed. You get too many fails and nobody’s gonna hire you for defense. Even the people are actually innocent will not hire you.

Now I do understand the intent of the original posters comment of why would somebody want to defend somebody who admits they raped or killed.? As you said, everybody is the right to a presumption of innocence. Because you don’t push back on the argument in every case, what will happen is you’ll wind up with innocent people in prison. What it does it make sure that the prosecution when they come to the courtroom, hopefully has their act together. And is fully prepared. If you cut corners on one case you’re probably going to cut corners on another case. This just ensures the system functions.

this has to be the dumbest thing i’ve read today.

it should be mentioned that i am not attacking you (the person who said they had to pay child support) … i’m attacking a system that would allow this. what in the taco bell shitting hell was going through a persons head when they wrote that law?

I’m also curious as to what he’s referring to

I also watched a report from Mariana Van Zeller about the drug. She got in contact with people that make the drug and she got a chance to interview police who have to deal with the mess.

Can’t find a link to her report.

There are literal documentaries talking about this.

Here’s one source

Source

And another

2nd source

Fentanyl is frequently being mixed with a potent animal tranquilizer called

xylazine (known on the street as “tranq” or “tranq dope”), creating a dangerous and often fatal combination. This mixture has been declared an "emerging threat

So yeah it’s out there

How is it a gamble if I already know the answer? That’s not gambling. That’s going and picking up the winning ticket. trying to see how this is a bad thing for anybody. I mean, other than the person who won on the next round.

I’d go to this date and buy this ticket. I’d buy this ticket because there was no winner and next week was a 1.8 billion dollar winner

What was free and what was topless?

Says a lot about birds that eat them

And most importantly: it’s never a war crime the first time

This is an excellent idea. Now, not only as a kid eating crappy food. The entire family is annoyed with the kid. This is a win-win

Dementia and Alzheimer’s. Yeah that is a nasty way to go

1 man.

With a particular set of skills…