• penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Cool, now let’s ban Google, Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter and every single social media platform that does the same exact thing as TikTok. I have never used TikTok, but this is fucking bullshit. Facebook literally ruined elections and lives around the world.

  • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    These threads/articles always get the facts wrong, TikTok is not “getting banned”, they are just forcing the company to divest from it’s Chinese parent company.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Does the legislation also include penalties for Samsung for preinstalling TikTok on my fucking Smart TV and making the app non-removable ?

      • Sina@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think people that are very interested in TikTok largely overlap with the vertical video crazies :-)

        • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Have you like, talked, to a teenager or early 20 year old at all during the last three years? Either you don’t understand the huge cultural impact tiktok has had for that age group, or you think every single person that age is a “vertical video crazy”.

          • Sina@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            , or you think every single person that age is a “vertical video crazy”.

            Sounds about right to me ^

    • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If you think Taiwan and Ukraine are “other countries’ wars” I have bad news for you. It’s better to pay as much money as we can now before the payment is made with american lives.

      Israel is something else obviously, as was US involvement Iraq and Afghanistan. But the bulk of the money is absolutely worth spending if you value your freedom. It has nothing to do with the housing crisis whatsoever. The US has enough money for both.

    • Robin.Net (she/her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Conservatives have been purposely tanking uncontroversial legislation so that “Biden doesn’t get any wins”. Do you genuinely think it is possible for the current legislature to pass bills that would fix something as complex as the housing crisis?

      • FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would accept that as an excuse if the Democrats did anything meaningful when they have a majority, but they don’t.

        • Robin.Net (she/her)@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          The last time they had a meaningful majority they spent their time (72 working days) on ACA (a major healthcare reform), pulling us out of a recession, appointing two supreme court justices, and so much more. They are known as the most productive Congress since Lyndon B Johnson was president. The last official majority they had they spent their very thin majority cleaning up after Donald Trump and dealing with COVID.

          Democrats don’t get strong majorities for long periods of time like Republicans do, and they are expected to fix every issue plus clean up after the newest national disaster that Republicans created. Maybe if we gave them time and a strong enough majority they would get more done.

          • FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            First, you should put this in air quotes: “a major healthcare reform”. It’s only a reform if you the consumer can absorb the price gouging required to access our health care system in the first place.

            Secondly, Obama had a supermajority for a time. He could have done anything if he’d have been willing to do the work.

            Americans can’t eat excuses, and for me at least, it’s no longer acceptable to simply be slightly less conservative than the other conservatives.

  • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t like big government but I have zero sympathy in this case. TikTok is the greatest cancer on modern society and I will not change my mind on that.

    • Alice@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nah, this entire thing is about US control. They’re upset that it’s a different government that’s spying on us this time. No sympathy for TikTok but there’s no good way to spin this.

      Btw, you know if TikTok sells to a US company, they’ll be just as rancid, right?

      • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I agree but TikTok is worthless in general. The content it serves people is literal brain rot. Also, I don’t want it to sell, I just want it to die and never come back.

    • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I feel like most people would rather use shady, free VPNs instead. There’ll probably be an increase in them too

  • Responsabilidade@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I thought that US was the country of freedom, but turns out that the freedom is just to racists, nazis and for them to fuck up other countries.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because China is collecting information from millions of US citizens. Plus they control what the US citizens can see and interact with. US has no control over Tik Tok and that scares them. Why are Facebook and X not banned? Because Facebook and X are US based have to comply with the US regulators and share every collected information with the government.

        • RavenFellBlade@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You do know that the overwhelming majority of investment and control in TikTok is already based in the US, and the only Chinese national involved with the app was the creator who already cashed out and retired a long time ago?

            • RavenFellBlade@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              60% of ByteDance is owned by global investors, most of which are based in the US. 20% is owned by the original co-founders, none of whom have any ties to the CCP, and the remaining 20% is owned by employees, almost all of which are in California. The overwhelming majority of the company is already owned by Americans. This entire thing is all about trying to silence a source of information that challenges and refutes government interests, particularly where Palestine is concerned.

  • Afkargh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Interesting that Temu and AliExpress are also China owned, yet there’s no mention of any issues with them.

    • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I suggest you read the bill. It isn’t a tik tok ban. It’s actually quite a good piece of legislation.

      • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It is a vague and sprawling piece of legislation that gives money to Israel and Ukraine, makes Fentanyl more illegal, makes money laundering for fentanyl more illegal, allows seizure and use if Russian assets, restricts “foreign adversaries” from distributing and maintaining apps, restricts “foreign adversaries” from transferring data away from the US, and makes Iranian terrorism more illegal.

        It does like 3 things that are fine, but these should all be different bills (the data transfer bits, seizing Russian assets, and sending aide to Ukraine, though that is getting iffy)

        It IS a TikTok band and explicitly names ByteDance and TikTok, and also vaguely defines foreign adversaries to the point where it could be any person operating in a country that the US doesn’t like.

        “Quite a good piece of legislation” is only true if you mean quite as sprawling and good as ill defined

        • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          “sending aide to Ukraine, though that is getting iffy”

          This tells me everything I need to know. That you would even say something like this means you have no idea what you’re talking about.

          Additionally, you realize that those are all separate bills, right?

    • interolivary@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Well, they’re totally different platforms . The rationale behind the TikTok ban (and I’m not saying I’m in favor of it or opposed to it) is that they can do spooky spooky things with your personal data and your attention – your opinions can be nudged once there’s enough data on you and your eyeballs are on the app half the day. And just to repeat, I’m not saying I agree with the ban (well, not with banning just TikTok anyhow…)

      Temu and AliExpress have their own problems (like the absolutely mind boggling waste of finite resources) but nobody’s worried Temu is radicalizing boys or collecting tons of your personal data. And yes even Temu does collect data just like everyone else nowadays, but it’s a shopping site; compared to a social network there’s not all that much you can get out of your users or too many ways to really influence them outside of making them spend more money

      • senseamidmadness@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The “data privacy” argument is bullshit and the people pushing for this law know it. That’s what is being sold to people but it is not why this TikTok ban got passed. It got passed because American social media companies are pissed that TikTok is outcompeting them for the attention of young people, and because the US government has a heavy hand in what algorithms are allowed to push on Facebook and Google and others. A good portion of Facebook’s initial funding came from government sources.

        “Data privacy” is just an excuse. Lobbying from the intelligence agencies and social media companies is why it’s really being enacted.

        • interolivary@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh yeah it absolutely is bullshit, I’m not saying that. Or, well, it is true they’re likely collecting tons of data but it’s not like US companies don’t do it too and for reasons that are probably just as bad. This is why I tend to think that if you’re going to ban TikTok for collecting data, you can’t ignore Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Apple et al