NoviOcean’s wave power technology, developed over several years, has been tested in wave pools and a real environment near Stockholm. A small version powers homes on Svanholmen island, proving the concept works at sea.

On one square kilometer, 15 wave power plants can generate 15 MW, compared to offshore wind’s 10 MW. Combined, they can produce 25 MW, sharing the costs of the sea area and transmission cable.

According to the firm, the hybrid approach delivers more consistent energy, as waves generate power for days after the wind subsides. Additionally, wave plants can be placed closer to shore without visually disturbing the coastline.

  • BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    I get the appeal of having a mixture of renewable generation methods, but is it really the best way to jsht put them all on one structure? Do waves not somewhat inferfere with the action of both solar panels (which will not be properly aligned of they’re rocking about) and turbines (which surely suffer if they are in turbulent airflow thanks to being jostled about)?

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I speculate that this balanced out by the fact that a single one of these can more easily connect to the power grid and are more efficient to deploy and maintain in large quantities.

      You could place these almost anywhere and they will generate something.

      • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yea, but I would imagine the upkeep and maintenance on these, especially due to being in salt water, is higher than it needs to be. Simple is generally better for these things.

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I can definitely see them being useful in remote areas where large scale power generation projects are not viable.

    • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      The pictured kings of turbine works very well with wind from any direction. I’d be more concerned about having low friction bearings so cost to sea water.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    power 1,000 homes per day

    Good that the journalist does not confuse kW and kWh but “homes” is a very understandable unit they somehow got wrong.

  • CherenkovBlue@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    For fuck’s sake, a microreactor could do all of this for the footprint of a bedroom (plus some additional space for the staff). It would work for years and constantly provide power with no issues from storms, dust, salt, or needing distributed maintenance (and environmental disruption) over a square km.

    This isn’s just some generic hand waving. Go look up the company Radiant. It’s going to happen within a few years. Demonstration is slated for 2026.

  • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would hope it would be at least slightly more well-designed than the render where the miniature windmills are positioned perfectly to block the solar