• 5dh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Depends, who do you want to shield what information from? Signal knows all of their users’ phone numbers. You can hide it from other Signal users. All depends on your threat model.

            • 5dh@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Right, then Signal might not be the best option. The NSA can easily track who’s using Signal, and possibly do some traffic correlation to reveal who’s talking to who.

              But to state that there is no privacy on Signal at all is a bit of a stretch.

            • oddsignal@eviltoast.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I mean online providers like jmp.chat, my sudo, and virtualsim will hook you up for a couple of bucks. So sure, if you are seriously cash constrained or crypto is unobtainable for you, then not so easy.

      • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Basically a app that lock you with a phone, giving you only one account. Centralized servers. Not good.

        • 5dh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Good for some use cases. Only if the Signal Foundation stays in the current track and it doesn’t go south like with Mozilla.

          For a privacy chat group with random people, maybe another app would be a bit better.

      • qpsLCV5@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        if it’s free, you’re the product.

        signal seems really good right now, with open source clients, but they already show that they’d like to keep the ecosystem locked down by not allowing 3rd party clients. at some point they will need a way to pay for their datacenters, and even if they claim the foundation or whatever is doing well, i can see the pestering for donations getting much worse in the future.

        that said, threema is far from optimal too, im still waiting for matrix servers to become solid options. last time i wanted to set up synapse, the only captcha they supported was fucking Google captcha :|

        • unskilled5117@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Your arguments don’t really make sense in the context of you asking for Threema instead, even if you acknowledge that it isn’t optimal.

          [Signal] already showed that they’d like to keep the ecosystem locked down by not allowing 3rd party clients

          Neither does Threema, it is a closed eco system? And in fact there is Molly, a hardened Signal fork for Android

          At some point they will need a way to pay for their datacenters, […] i can see the pestering for donations getting much worse in the future.

          Threema is a paid app though. So you consider an app asking for donations worse than a paid one? I agree though that their financials aren’t the best, since they seem to be living off a loan, but thats even more an argument to donate.

        • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          it’s generally true, but Signal is asking for and depends on donations because they have no other revenue source (unlike google which does not ask for donations because indeed they monatize you, the “product”).

          • stationary_melon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean, those are valid concerns. Most messaging apps require a server to be running at all times. If there is only one centralized server, costs will start to pile up, so they’ll need a way to make money; either by asking for donations, making a paid tier or by selling your data.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              True! That’s why I much prefer federated protocols so that the cost (and data!) does not pile up in one specific place. You can end up paying for it - in form of your VPS bill or the cost of the hosting hardware.

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Seen a lot of different opinion in this, but personnaly I would recommended this.

    • SimpleX, for the most privacy (but not really appropriate here) Wouldn’t use any of threema wire and else, as it’s not the best.

    • A good option in the case of this project is a matrix server, if the group is public it’s the best thing. Try to host it somewhere else than matrix.org. Will have no real hiding but surely anonymously if done correctly

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That is indeed a massive improvement, but until they allow multiple profiles per number - that would still mean either using the same account with internet randos as I do with IRL friends, or renting a whole other number and risking losing the account once the ownership of the number expires.

    • Samsy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not usable until they support unifiedpush. I won’t burn my battery with simplex.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Do it on Wire and I’m in. No way I’m giving you my phone number.

    This is a privacy community ffs