• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Agreed.

      No f’in way this happens, especially not in the same week when Kamala Harris goes on national TV to say she’s a capitalist.

      With that said, I still hope they try. It should be inconvenient at least to run a monopoly.

    • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      And Microsoft for monopoly reasons.

      Add AT&T, Time-Warner, and all of the other ISPs that own streaming platforms for anticompetitive reasons.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What exactly does Apple have a monopoly over? Or Amazon? Both have plenty of competition, while, let’s be honest, Google cornered a segment the market really well with Search + Chrome. Google is basically dictating direction of Web based standards towards an ad-driven, zero-privacy, centralized internet.

      If anything, after Google it should be Microsoft again.

      • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t see Amazon as a monopoly, but as far as Apple goes, they currently hold the majority of phone sales in the US. A big reason for that is that they have a history of artificially preventing you from using certain device features with non-Apple products or services. iMessage is a good example as it took an order from China for Apple to add the RCS messaging standard that Android phones have had for years. Another example is that, while music apps on Android can use Google Assistant features, only Apple Music can utilize Siri features on iOS.

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sounds like regulations are in order, yes. EU (and ironically China) doing the good work. But it’s hardly a monopoly. They just have a successful product, like it or not.

  • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. Aetna CVS Caremark
    2. Cigna Express Scripts
    3. fucking ticketmaster
    4. Google
    5. Kroger (and they want to merge AGAIN?)

    Let’s start here for now

  • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As much as I want this to happen, I fear it’ll drag on for years and then never happen or end up watered down where they split the company and manage them independently (a bit like BT in the UK but still owned by Alphabet.

      • firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        A major issue for the US is that when the president changes, the DOJ can simply elect to stop processing the suit. It’s hard to get 8 years of uninterrupted movement on an action like this.

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Any guesses on how this would affect Android and Firefox?

    I’m not 100% on how the Android business works so I’m not sure how important Goggle’s involvement is.

    Firefox relies on Google’s ‘default search engine’ bribe quite a lot, and they might not be able to offer that anymore(?)

    • Remmy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Android has been largely gutted and depends more and more on google play services, with few exceptions like some AOSP-based roms like lineageos, iodeOS, etc

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Haha. OG conspiracy theory time! I was gonna say this breakup will never happen, but I could totally see it being a plutocratic quid pro quo to split Android from Google and set up an entirely new entity to start charging for the OS or closing it off as a pixel exclusive — something Google couldn’t do without major backlash and probably lawsuits, unless the government “forced” their hand and compelled them. The controlling shareholders would remain the same, and the government would get to act like it’s taking legitimate action, fighting for the working class, against monopolies.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think Android is big enough to be immediately forked. There’s many existing forks already, if they tried to take it private many companies would be invested in a new “Android core” being developed upstream - it’s one of the few situations where open source can work, because businesses would throw money at an org that keeps them competitive

        But I’ll be hopeful but pessimistic about a Google breakup. It would be huge, it would be real change