• FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    Between 7digital, HD tracks, Qobuz store, and my local physical media store, Tidal has never made sense to me. For $15 or $20 a month I can buy and own every track and album I want.

    I use bottom-of-the-barrel Pandora for streaming when I am working out or washing dishes. That’s it.

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    I hope it’s still the case as I have Tidal subscription, but they were the ones giving the most money per stream to the artist.

    I wouldn’t want to move to another streaming platform unless they are even better for artists.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      From what I’ve read (although my numbers are a few years old), Qobuz and Napster pay artists even more than Tidal. The former even significantly so (about 3x, from what I’ve read), although it is slightly more expensive. Both also support lossless audio.

      And, for completion: Among the big-tech streaming services, the one that seems to pay the best is Apple Music, with a little more than half of what Tidal pays. The worst ones are amazon and Spotify which both pay about a third of Tidal.

  • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m back to pirating all of my music. I will buy CDs or pay for downloads for artists that I really like or smaller artists, but I am fucking through with the streaming platforms. They just enshittify more and more.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I never stopped. I have streaming video and audio subscriptions, But I’ve never stopped keeping up my catalogs.

      Every time I get over invested in one company or another they end up going out of business or selling and reducing half of their catalog. I’ll give d+ their sub for Agatha, I’ll give Hulu their sub for Futurama. When Wednesday comes back I’ll swap D+ for Netflix for the season again. But every single one of those episodes still goes to my local archive The same as if I would have recorded or a VHS tape in the '90s.

      • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        your foresight is much better than mine! I even deleted a bunch of my old stuff because, “I can just stream it whenever I want to watch it”… they took me for a fool, and they were right!

      • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        It seamlessly integrated your own local media with tidal. Instead of encoding or downloading, you could just add tidal music as if you had a physical copy of it. It could also be used for radio and plexamp mixes.

  • rjek@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wow is it still a thing? I had no idea. It always seemed to sit in this weird limbo between Spotify and YouTube Music (for people who just want to listen to music) and Qobuz and HD Tracks (for people who just want to listen to their new £250 power leads). Never sure what it was actually for.

    • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Their sound quality is just significantly better compared to Spotify. Even with my bluetooth earbuds I can hear the difference. Spotify and Youtube just sound muddy in comparison.

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        They’re not the only ones anymore though. Apple, Amazon, Deezer, Qobuz and Napster also have lossless audio support.

    • Drathro@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      Cheaper than Spotify for the number of users it gives you (at least where I live) and the app itself has functioned significantly better than Spotify’s has in my experience so far while not depriving me of any of the artists and albums I listen to regularly. Early on in its life it was big time selling snake oil, but at this point it’s just a solid alternative to Spotify and YouTube music which have both, frankly, gotten “too big to fail” and have begun enshittification because of it. Man we need more competition…

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’ve had a Tidal subscription for about a year. It’s recommendation algo is way way better than Spotify and there are none of those spammy 1 minute tracks that Spotify has because ‘artists’ have gamed the system.

      They don’t have a Linux app but the PWA works fine. Minimize the window to reduce CPU usage (I know that sounds crazy but it actually works).

      • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        HDtracks.

        That being said if you’re buying FLACs from major labels for $40 while indie bands release albums in FLAC via band camp for $3, you’re a chump.

        The members of Led Zeppelin that are still don’t need the money nearly as much, and even if they did most of it isn’t going to them anyways.

    • Dempf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Streams flac. Good supplement to piracy. I might switch to Qobuz sometime, but it works well for now.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      A music app like Spotify founded by Jay-Z.

      The proposal was to pay the artists more.

      Sounds good, but I think the majority goes to the labels anyways, so it doesn’t change much for the artists.

      The main issue is executives basically enslaving their artists with “360 deal” contracts.

      • Virkkunen@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Spotify actually pays 70% of the streams to the label, which trickles down to a bunch of nothing for the artist. Tidal wanted to change that and pay directly to the artist

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          How is that possible if the labels own the music and there’s a contract that sets the percentages.

          All music streaming services say “paying the artist” in their communication.