• Dalek Thal@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sure, if Splatoon 3 were actually good. It’s a game designed from the ground up to be frustrating, between terrible matchmaking, peer-to-peer multiplayer, and stage design that forces players into very lopsided combat.

    Play something good with your family, not Splatoon 3.

    • Gamma@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      How dare someone else like something you don’t!!! And with their family?! The sick fuck

    • SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Pretty much nothing you said is true, it was not “designed from the ground up to be frustrating” and the other statements are too vague to even bother attacking. “Not even wrong” is the phrase that comes to mind.

      You didn’t even mention an example of a game which would count as “something good”.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d love to play it with my niece and nephew if the game had a split screen mode. Not going to happen if they need a Switch and a copy of the game each.

    • SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Splatoon 1 actually had local multiplayer - it was 2-player only, but for those of us with kids, it was good enough. Split screen multiplayer in Splatoon 2/3 would’ve been great.