Apple being Apple again. Just why does anyone actually like that company?

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Man, they’re seething against the EU, totally pissed that the legislators worked against their abuse over developers and rubbed against their cash cow.

    Apple is all about money and fucking the user, being no different from Meta or Google. All they have is shinier hardware.

  • Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just why does anyone actually like that company?

    I mean, if Google weren’t shit, I’m sure Android would be more viable. They’ve can’t even keep a consistent brand! They’ve gone from Google Play this and that, to migrating everything - including podcasts - to YouTube.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Android is more popular globally, the only place where it isn’t true (AFAIK) is USA where the colour of the text bubble is important for reasons that defy logic.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      migrating everything - including podcasts - to YouTube

      If only there were other apps for podcasts on Android, it would be a viable operating system.

      Google is kind of crap, but Android has a lot more built-in escape hatches than iOS does. People don’t seem to use them as much as I’d hoped, but they’re available.

      • PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve been using Podcast Addict for years now. Dunno why people think they are bound to one thing when Android offers so many choices.

        • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think they’re just have choice paralysis. There’s too much stuff on Android, and picking something is really rather anoying.

          Something like a Gallery. There’s probably a 1000 galleries on Play Store, 50% of them are “my first app”, that display a fullscreen ad every other photo.

          You have to know what you want, research it, then get it. Non-nerds don’t really care about that.

          My guess. I’m a nerd who does care about all that.

          • Gunpachi@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You do have a point, but each App’s play store page itself shows whether it has ads or in-app purchases. One can use that as an indicator for selecting an app. So people just need to pay attention to the small text right below the App’s title

            example

            Then there is always f-droid . You can find really good quality software without ads in fdroid. I rarely use the play store these days (except when I have to update whatsapp and banking apps)

            • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Again, you’re telling this to an android nerd. I’m aware.

              I’m speaking from a perspective of an average joe, who is 100% not aware of the existance of F-droid or is convinced that it’s malware.

              I’m also don’t expect people sift through hundreds of apps, opening each page and checking permissions/ads/reviews.

              People install apps either because they’ve heard about it on TV/whatever, or a friend told them to install this specific app.

              This is why people rely on default apps, and compare “phones” based on that.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I will confess I used Google podcasts for years not realizing that the FOSS alternatives were MASSIVE improvements.

  • ahnesampo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Third party browser & JavaScript engine + ability to install web apps on the Home screen = third party app store that doesn’t have to pay Apple’s fees.

    When Apple could force everyone to use Apple’s WebKit, web apps didn’t matter as much as Apple could limit WebKit features to push people to the App Store. E.g. it took ages to get push notifications on WebKit. If Google and Mozilla are free to make whatever improvements to their browser engines, the need to have native apps on the phone decreases considerably.

  • Lemmy Reddit That@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    An update from Apple. Apple actually reversed that decision. Finally. Tested on latest stable version of iOS 17.4 and it works. (from https://developer.apple.com/support/dma-and-apps-in-the-eu/#dev-qa ):

    Why don’t users in the EU have access to Home Screen web apps?

    UPDATE: Previously, Apple announced plans to remove the Home Screen web apps capability in the EU as part of our efforts to comply with the DMA. The need to remove the capability was informed by the complex security and privacy concerns associated with web apps to support alternative browser engines that would require building a new integration architecture that does not currently exist in iOS.

    We have received requests to continue to offer support for Home Screen web apps in iOS, therefore we will continue to offer the existing Home Screen web apps capability in the EU. This support means Home Screen web apps continue to be built directly on WebKit and its security architecture, and align with the security and privacy model for native apps on iOS.

    Developers and users who may have been impacted by the removal of Home Screen web apps in the beta release of iOS in the EU can expect the return of the existing functionality for Home Screen web apps with the availability of iOS 17.4 in early March.

    Finally, some good news.

    • hemmes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Lol, what phone are you using?

      Edit: Why am I being downvoted? The dude said to fuck someone with a cactus. That’s hilarious - no one else thinks that’s funny? I’m still laughing lol

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        OnePlus 10 pro.

        Would never sacrifice the flexibility and customizability of an Android device for the clunky and unintuitive UI of an iPhone.

        • hemmes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          So why fuck Apple? You’re using an Android device, Apple has updated their software in a way that doesn’t compel you to want to try an Apple device, end of story why all the vitriol?

          I could see, maybe, if you were already an Apple user and wanted them to make a change that you want on your device. But having so much hate for a device you have no intention of using anyway?

          • rbits@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            This change impacts every mobile user, not just iPhone users. iPhones are a good portion of the userbase of most apps/websites. For PWAs to gain mass adoption, it needs to be available for the majority of users. This change means that will not be the case in the EU.

            PWAs have just been doomed by Apple, and unless Apple reverts this change, they will now never be successful in the EU. And probably not even outside of the EU since non-european products still have european users.

  • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The probably couldn’t afford the development /s

    But on the positive side, Apple is now forced to allow other app stores on all phones in the EU.

    So that’s probably a bigger win than this is a loss.

      • Lemmy Reddit That@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        @rikudou@lemmings.world Just an update for you. I just tried my PWA app on last stable version of iOS 17.4 and it works again. I made a quick google search if it’s just me, or Apple actually reversed they decision and I found this (from https://developer.apple.com/support/dma-and-apps-in-the-eu/#dev-qa ):

        Why don’t users in the EU have access to Home Screen web apps?

        UPDATE: Previously, Apple announced plans to remove the Home Screen web apps capability in the EU as part of our efforts to comply with the DMA. The need to remove the capability was informed by the complex security and privacy concerns associated with web apps to support alternative browser engines that would require building a new integration architecture that does not currently exist in iOS.

        We have received requests to continue to offer support for Home Screen web apps in iOS, therefore we will continue to offer the existing Home Screen web apps capability in the EU. This support means Home Screen web apps continue to be built directly on WebKit and its security architecture, and align with the security and privacy model for native apps on iOS.

        Developers and users who may have been impacted by the removal of Home Screen web apps in the beta release of iOS in the EU can expect the return of the existing functionality for Home Screen web apps with the availability of iOS 17.4 in early March.

        Finally, some good news.