• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s not what I wanted either. But that’s a good idea to have. What I want is, if, after reviewing the list of available updates, I click “update all”, I should not then have to click each one to “update” and then “install” one at a time. Also, I should have the choice to say “skip this version” and “don’t tell me about updates for that one ever again”

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Am I the only one who doesn’t use automatic updates for apps? I like to read the change logs, both out of mild curiosity, and to know if an app has a “major UI update”

      • N4CHEM@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’ve made a habit of opening GitHub issues asking for a changelog on those apps that I use that don’t provide one. Most developers are open and helpful, some are not.

        The worst experience so far was with Wikipedia, they provide poor update information (usual “we update our app regularly to being you improvements”) and replied weeks later with “that’s what most apps do”.

    • BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I stopped auto updating the 3rd time my god damn app was force closed when using it. Either update for the app itself or damn webview. Been many years since then, so not sure if things changed but man it was frustrating having things just go poof in the middle of something.

    • centof@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No! There are dozens of us! Dozens

      But to be real, I hate how automatic updates just assumes the newer version will be better than the current. Enshittification is just as real in apps as in web services. And automatic updates help enable Enshittification by making that assumption. Of course, It’s more applicable to the app store or play store than to f-droid.

      • Gogo Sempai@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I used an app called Noice from F-Droid which has a lot of pleasant background noises (including white noises which I sometimes use while sleeping). One update, the author suddenly added internet permission, pulled out all the noise music files from the app and put them behind a server. Now it only works if you have an active internet connection OR you buy a premium.

        Thankfully, I still have the last “good” version.

      • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not long ago I watched the fdroid app itself enshittify.
        I was testing an update of another app, saw it didn’t really work yet, went to roll it back, and the downgrade button was gone. So I tracked down why and found fdroid had removed it. So I went to downgrade the fdroid app and the downgrade button was gone …
        Had to hunt the bare apk and downgrade manually.

        I’m still on the old fdroid version procrastinating looking for an alternative.

        • everett@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Downgrading can be dangerous, since app data meant for a newer version of an app can crash an older version that doesn’t know what to do with it. This doesn’t really feel like enshittification, just saving users from themselves by removing the danger button. It’s not like F-Droid is forcing everyone to use the newest version… old versions are still on the website, and they still let you easily grab an old version in-app if you’re doing a fresh install.

          • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Then make it an option in the experimental section of the settings.
            If an app cannot accept the updated data, if it has even been launched in the new version, the worst that can happen is that it doesn’t work. You can still uninstall, or you can clear the data. You can also pop up a warning before downgrading, explaining the possibility of needing to clear the apps data.
            It is still an essential feature for many.
            Uninstalling and reinstalling is not only inconvenient, it can also change values like the apps id, that can be essential for advanced users.

            For me, the app had an update that removed a feature I relied on without replacing it, making it worse as a result. This therefore makes a valid example to the point made above, that people may not enable automatic updates because updates aren’t always better, sometimes they make an app worse.

            • everett@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You can still uninstall, or you can clear the data.

              And in both cases the user data is gone. I’d call that the worst case.

  • DODOKING38@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Obtanium supports f’droid so I’ve been using that, not for background updates but more so the fact that it actually notifies me if there is an update, F’droid app seems to notify me 1/3 of the time.

    • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yes, but as the name says, privilege extension requires privileged access to the system, hence granting fdroid (much) more trust.

      In recent android versions, background update is no longer a privileged permission, hence can be performed without privilege extension.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The API that FDroid is using has only just come out. Before then, without using root and scripts to enable higher privileges, no app could auto-update in the background.

      FDroid has long has the ability to automatically download updates, however installation always required a confirmation from the user for each app.

      • ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The API that FDroid is using has only just come out.

        Not true. Android has supported rootless unattended upgrades at a system level since Android 12 (October 4 2021). That was nearly 2 and a half years ago, so it’s been a while.

        This is what Neo Store used. F-Droid only just now got around to supporting this with this recent update.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, but it requires an feature that is only available on Android 12 and above.