- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
Nevertheless, as Bluesky grows, there are likely to be multiple professionally-run indexers for various purposes. For example, a company that performs sentiment analysis on social media activity about brands could easily create a whole-network index that provides insights to their clients.
(source)
Is that supposed to be a selling point? Because I’d like to stay far, far away from that, thank you very much.
No thank you.
Why? What’s so bad about blue sky that you don’t like?
It’s algorithmic and run by venture capital. 2 things that made social media the toxic mess it is today.
The algorithms/feeds are easily the best part about Bluesky because they can be custom-made. If you don’t like the feeds provided by Bluesky, you can just make one of your own that displays what you want to see. I use many such feeds.
This has always been the killer feature of the fediverse. Open non-exploitative content algorithms. So weird to see people against it for no reason.
When I see people criticize something they have clearly not used I get motivated to try it.
Good for you, I’ve never tried punching myself in the balls and I don’t like the idea of it, let me know what’s its like please.
It’s run by a shit stained billionare venture capatilist to make money. It can’t be anything but a toxic shit show, the proof ?, they ball are, so doing the same thing and expecting a different result is insane.
