• BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    4K is overkill enough. 8K is a waste of energy. Let’s see optimization be the trend in the next generation of graphics hardware, not further waste.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah. Once games are rendering 120fps at a native 6K downscaled to an amazing looking 4K picture, then maybe you could convince me it was time to get an 8K TV.

      Honestly most people sit far enough from the TV that 1080p is already good enough.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I find 4k is nice on computer monitors because you can shut off anti-aliasing entirely and still leave jagged edges behind. 1440p isn’t quite enough to get there.

        Also, there’s some interesting ideas among emulator writers about using those extra pixels to create more accurate CRT-like effects.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh yeah, I have read some very cool things about emulators and being able to simulate the individual phosphors with 4K resolution. I have always been a sucker for clean crisp pixels (that’s what I was trying to achieve on the shitty old CRT I had for my SNES) so I haven’t jumped into the latest on crt shaders myself.

        • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          But anti-aliasing needs far less performance. And you need to mess about with scaling on a 4k monitor which is always a pain. 1440p for life IMHO

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s how I feel when people complain about 4k only being 30fps on PS5.

    I laugh because my 1080p tv lets the PS5 output at like 800fps.

  • ivanafterall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    A few years ago, I got a good deal on a 4K projector and setup a 135" screen on the wall. The lamp stopped working and I’ve put off replacing it. You know what didn’t stop working? The 10+ year old Haier 1080p TV with a ding in the screen and the two cinder blocks that currently keep it from sliding across the living room floor.

      • ivanafterall@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wish. It’s sitting on the floor and there’s a rug, so the cinder blocks are in front of it at the corners. Now my bed is a little more saggy. I might need some new furniture.

  • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Has anyone else here never actually bought a TV? I’ve been given 3 perfectly good TVs that relatives were gonna throw out when they upgraded to smart TVs. I love my dumb, free TVs. They do exactly what I need them to and nothing more. I’m going to be really sad when they kick the bucket.

  • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have a 4K 120hz OLED TV. The difference is quite drastic compared to my old 1080p LED. It’s certainly sharper, and probably the practical limit. I’ve also seen 8K, and, meh. I don’t even care if it’s noticable, it’s just too expensive to be worthwhile. We should just push more frames and lower latency for now, or, the Gods forbid, optimise games properly.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I enjoy 4k on the monitors I sit only a few inches from all day, but so far I find it hard to justify a whole chain of upgrades for the living room when I think the picture quality already looks great at 10+ feet away or whatever . To be clear, I mean I don’t see the need to upgrade the living room from 1080p to 4k, let alone beyond that

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It really depends on the size of tv. It’s like a cinema screen, you want very high resolutions for that even though it’s far away, because it’s a large size

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I think mine is 56 or 58 inches. A lot of people have commented that it’s large. It feels like the right size to me /shrug

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It depends how far it is, and personal preference.

          4k makes a massive difference for me on my TV, I’ll opt for it whenever I can. But it’s all personal preference and circumstance which is good to remember.

          Your situation isn’t the same as everyone’s, theirs a valid use for 1080p but also for 4k

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Certainly. I was only talking about my experience. When things break I’ll upgrade. But surprisingly to even me when I focus on the video quality on my TV, it’s still holding up well