• thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      At what exactly do you refer to? Meta does not need to federate with the Fediverse. I am not aware of any law that would force Meta doing this.

      • Lionir [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The DMA (Digital Markets Act) has clauses that force big companies that are considered “gatekeepers” to allow interoperability with other services.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yes, also why Apple is going to allow sideloading (even though they also are complying maliciously) and also MS now allows you to uninstall Edge.

            All of this, of course, only applies in the EU.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        We don’t know yet the full answer to that but I’d say being “opt in” without any sort of prompt ( especially when every other fucking Meta feature is “opt out” ), or having unidirectional federation would qualify as malicious.