I understand firefox is free software and greatly customisable. I think forks like LibreWolf are fantastic. But I believe the FOSS community needs to be more critical of mozilla. They haven’t been the sharpest tool in the drawer for a while…

Full article: https://brave.com/compare/firefox-vs-brave/

    • olympus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Brave is not funded by an ad company like Google.
      Because they are an ad company themselves, no ad company is going to fund them, they are competitors.
      Apart from that Brave is dependant to Google way more. More than 90% of their browser’s code is by Google developers. They don’t even have their own store lol and distribute extensions in Brave through Google’s chrome store!
      That’s independence? Calling Google for something basic like installing extensions to your browser?
      I prefer Mozilla’s and Vivaldi’s model. They both get money from their search deals (Mozilla with Google, Vivaldi with Microsoft) but they are not ad companies themselves.
      Yes, I wouldn’t use a browser from an ad company, no matter the size of the company.

    • Nyonnyan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Correct, but so is linux itself as seen here, likewise, Microsoft also helps the development of the linux kernel as seen on this Linux Foundation webpage. Sometimes ad services sponsor non ad related projects.

      In the case of firefox however, they are funded by google to have it be the default search engine, and not because Firefox itself sells ad spaces. So I dont quite get the point you are making