• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The treasurer actually did nothing other than swing in their hammock (to quote Paul Keating on Peter Costello) as the world’s economy changed for good or ill.

    The budget papers state that the extra $18bn came mostly from $12.7bn in better than expected company tax revenue due to “sustained elevated commodity prices”.

    The government boasted the $100bn turnaround from a $77.9bn forecast deficit to a $22.1bn surplus was “the biggest nominal budget improvement in Australian history”.

    Right now Barnaby Joyce is displaying surplus levels of chutzpah by suggesting the inland rail project is in danger of becoming a “white elephant”.

    It was always going to be built on a flimsy business case that, as Gabrielle Chan noted, forecast that half of the freight to be carried on the completed rail would be coal.

    As Alan Kohler recently noted, the economy is so near capacity that approving new fossil fuel projects actually limits the ability to build homes, or productive infrastructure because there are not enough construction workers to go round.


    The original article contains 994 words, the summary contains 170 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    We don’t want surplus unless times ahead seem economically unstable enough that saving up is a better idea than progressing