• Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I think we, the night folk, are descended from the people who stayed awake, making sure the campfire didn’t go out and/or keeping watch for predators.

    I wouldn’t be so upset, if there weren’t still nocturnal jobs to be done. But there ARE. We should have been singled out, early on, and told “okay, here’s the deal: you’re one of the night people. As an adult, please choose from these occupations that are best done at night. You will get a variety of subsidies and tax breaks, to encourage you to continue providing vital services, while the rest of us are sleeping.”

    Apart from things like night security, waste collection, maintenance, etc, there should also be “normal” services staffed by night people, in order to serve the other night people. Like, doctor and dental offices that cater to the times when night people are just getting off work, can take off work during the night, or are still up at night on the weekends.

    But none of that happens. Instead, the modern world is like “NOPE. WE WILL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO ABSOLUTELY ENFORCE A DAYLIGHT SCHEDULE, EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE COMPLETELY MASTERED ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY.”

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      6 months ago

      “ALSO WE WILL CHANGE THE TIME WHEN DAYLIGHT ITSELF DOES NOT MATCH WITH OUR ENFORCED DAYLIGHT SCHEDULE!”

    • FunkyMonk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s turtles all the way down, still beat left handers at times and places. USA measures shit in the approximation of one egotist tyrants body sizes whomist now long dust.

      • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        USA measures shit in the approximation of one egotist tyrants body sizes whomist now long dust

        I hate it, whenever this shit comes up. We didn’t use body-based measurements because of the EVIL TYRANNY OF THE HORRIBLE EVIL BAD EVIL KING.

        We used them because, while the king might have been a bit taller than the average man, he was still basically the same size as most people. And so the measurements were actually conveniently sized, based on the scale of the human body (ALSO, THE KING’S CUBIT WAS A STANDARD MEASUREMENT, WHICH IS A GOOD THING. SEE MY EDIT, BELOW).

        But the supposedly logical metric system calibrated the meter as one ten-millionth of the distance on the Earth’s surface from the north pole to the equator.

        That’s arguably mathematically beautiful. Arguably. But it’s not useful to people. It’s not based on the human body. I object to that. I think it was a deeply anti-populist decision, made by haughty nobles, who quite rightly got their heads chopped off, right after they came up with that shit.

        Those nobles had no idea how common people used measurements. They didn’t consider the people who actually built houses or tables or ships. They were planning on using the metric system to do pure science. That’s fine. That’s good. We need that. But there’s no reason the scientists can’t use a measurement that is also good for engineers and carpenters.

        But no, the aristocrats were going to pick something they thought of as numerically lovely, and never spared any fraction of a thought for the real people, who would have to use the measurements to do real-world shit. Again: it’s good that they had their heads chopped off. They were pieces of shit.

        When that revolution was happening, we should have revamped the metric system based on a Universal Standard Cubit. I think we should have gone and measured the cubit lengths of a million real people, from all cultures, all regions, all faiths, all races, and taken the average of them. That would have been useful and appropriate.

        EDIT: I’m just saying, if you’re going to hate on the nobility, at least be consistent. A lot of people are like “Cubits? No, because kings bad.”

        But then you’re like “Metric system good. Metric system forced on us by SMART aristocracy.”

        EDIT 2: PEOPLE ALSO FAIL TO REALIZE THAT THE ANCIENT CUBIT WAS A STANDARD MEASUREMENT, WHICH PROVIDED MOST OF THE BENEFITS OF MODERN STANDARD MEASUREMENTS, LITERALLY THOUSANDS OF YEARS BEFORE THE FUCKING METRIC SYSTEM.

        It’s TURBO DISHONEST to extoll the fucking virtues of metric standardization, then go “oh, stupid bad evil stupid evil dumb king was such an egotist that he FORCED his people to measure things using his arm.”

        MOTHERFUCKERS, IT WASN’T ABOUT THE KING’S PRIDE. IT WAS THE INVENTION OF A STANDARDIZED UNIT.

        You guys think standard units are good! That’s what the cubit was! People had literally been using their own forearms, but some genius was like “nah, we need a standard one…but we should keep it about the size of the arm. Might as well use the ruler’s arm as a ruler, that way he’ll probably pay for a bunch of them to be made, with his massive gold stash.”

          • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Thanks. I at hope some people at LEAST get it through their heads that you shouldn’t think of the ancient cubit as “big dumb king made people use his body measurements, because he had a big dumb ego.”

            As I said, it’s LITERALLY the actual opposite of that. Royal cubits were the first standardized measurement, and they brought probably 90 percent of the overall benefits that the later metric/SI system would bring, thousands of years later.

            • djsoren19@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Look I’m gonna be honest, I had zero opinions on cubits prior to seeing your post, mostly because I was unaware of their existence. Just based on your incredible passion alone, I guess I’ll think back on them fondly now, as a huge milestone for human civilization.

        • Kurokujo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Hard disagree. There is far too much variability in the body size of adult humans, especially when taking sex into account. Sure, maybe my foot closely resembles the foot-size of said monarch but my 5 ft tall wife’s doesn’t.

          There’s no reason to use body paste measurements for nearly any purpose in the modern day. You can’t build a house based on the rough size of someone’s arm when you have half a dozen people minimum working on a project. You need a standard unit which would need to be measured using a standard unit measuring device. Either way you need to use a measuring tool, so why not use a standard that makes the math easier.

          • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            There is far too much variability in the body size of adult humans

            Yeah, that’s why you have to choose between three different door sizes, when you go into any building. And why cars have to have different steering wheel sizes, for different sized people. Oh wait, no. That’s not how it works, at all. People’s average body size IS basically the same, if you exclude the actual dwarves and the actual NBA players.

            You need a standard unit which would need to be measured using a standard unit measuring device

            Yes. That’s why I suggested a Universal STANDARD Cubit. It would be a standard length, just like the meter. But it would be based on the PEOPLE. Not some random, useless fraction of the distance from the pole to the equator. How is that useful to anyone? Pegging the definition at least in the AREA of a human arm’s scale HAS to be better than that.

            use a standard that makes the math easier.

            Funny you should bring that up, too. The metric system should been based on 12, not 10. Dividing things by numbers other than 2 and 5 can be useful. And, by the way, you could ALWAYS multiply things by 10, just by adding a zero or removing a zero. That’s not some special thing that the metric system invented. I don’t know why people think that it is.

            • Kurokujo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              I read the edits on your original comment. I think you’re missing the point that the metric system at least scales in a reasonable and expected way, which is not the case in the imperial system of measurement.

              And to your point about averaging a human arm and using that as a measurement standard, no, it’s not necessarily better. You still need an exact standard that you have to measure against for any kind of precision. Making it similar to the size of a human body part doesn’t matter unless you’re estimating, which isn’t how anything is built anymore.

              There are reasons the old standards were abandoned.

              • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                You still need an exact standard that you have to measure against for any kind of precision

                THAT’S WHAT THE OLD CUBIT WAS.

                Go look it up. The Egyptians, Sumerians, and Israelites had standard cubit-sticks that they would keep in the palace and use to make the ruler-sticks, for actual use. That is the SAME CONCEPT OF STANDARDIZATION THAT MAKES THE METRIC SYSTEM USEFUL. Let’s be clear about that. These were carefully calibrated tools. That’s why you could use them to build highly functional irrigation canals, large buildings, and fucking pyramids. They weren’t estimating, based on the human body. The cubit was a STANDARD MEASURE, which brought almost all the benefits of standardization, as soon as it was invented.

                That concept of standardization was not invented by French motherfuckers, thousands of years later. It was already a thing.

                But you get that shit twisted. When French aristocrats in the 18th Century re-discover standardization, you’re like “AHHH, YES. MARVEL AT THE SUBTLE GENIUS OF THE MODERN EUROPEAN MIND.”

                Then, when the cubit comes up in conversation, you’re like “STUPID OLD KINGS, FORCING THEIR EGO-MEASUREMENTS ONTO THEIR PEOPLE. SO DUMB AND SO TYRANNICAL.”

                You can interpret standardization as either convenient and useful or as “OMG YOU’RE FORCING PEOPLE TO ACCEPT YOUR FOREARM AS A MEASURMENT.” Again: you’re choosing to see the modern metric standards as useful and the ancient standards as evil and/or stupid. For some reason that I don’t understand.

                To belabor the point I made in my final edit, I’m certain that the reason the king’s forearm was chosen as the template was so that THE ROYAL FAMILY WOULD FUND THE CREATION OF THE STANDARDIZATION SYSTEM. That’s pretty fucking smart, on a number of different levels. It was the true invention of standard units AND it was a brilliant way to corner the government into supporting it. And it made sure people didn’t have any choice but to start USING the standards, because otherwise they could be seen as badmouthing the king. Fucking genius.

                I’m also pretty sure the standard cubits weren’t changed to fit each new monarch’s body. They just kept the standard calibration rods and maybe, like, claimed that all the kings were the same size. That didn’t really matter. The point is, the standard measurement system retained the backing of the ruling dynasty. And as for different kings and regions having different cubits, THAT didn’t matter at all. You didn’t cooperate on building projects with your neighbors, in the ancient world. You were either trading with them for commodities that weren’t measured in anything other than quantity and weight, or else you were fighting them. You never ran into any problem that could have been solved by a global standard cubit.

                Just…please at least go confirm all this on the wikipedia page for the cubit. Please understand that it’s literally the opposite of “dumb king body measurement, because dumb king’s ego was big.”

                Literally. The concept is literally the actual opposite of that.

                • hitwright@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Literally the first thing on wikipedia: The cubit is an ancient unit of length based on the distance from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger.

                  I’m pretty sure the dude is trying to say that the measurement is not accurate. I’m not surprised that it could be accurate and standartized from one town to the next. As soon as the first dissagreement starts, it’s gonna get standartized. Otherwise it’s useless as unit.

                  Meter has a bonus that it doesn’t allow people to use his body parts for almost precise measurement. Actually blocks a lot of retards from saying “Nuh uh, I myself measured it, so I’m right and your ruler is wrong!”

                  Now when I think of it, Cubit is more or less exactly like the inch. It doesn’t match basically anyones finger, different countries had their own standard. You can and many people do use it as a measurement. Side-effect, seeing memes about Napoleon being a dwarf. XD

        • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah but metric was built that way so there’s a reference that isn’t “We all agreed an inch = this long”.

          If we lost every metric ruler, scale, micrometer, etc, we can backtrack and make a new one from the description. Try using your thumb as an inch reference.

          • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yes, algorithm-based standardization IS an actual new (and very recent) development of the modern SI system. But remember, the new definitions are indeed VERY NEW. The metric system originally relied on standard meter-bars and weights, which would be used to physically calibrate everybody’s meter-sticks.

            Try using your thumb as an inch reference.

            YOU’RE STILL NOT UNDERSTANDING WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT, WITH THE CUBIT SYSTEM.

            The old cubit system that everyone is deriding, when they say “lol, imagine using a king’s arm as your measurement” was NOT a matter of using anyone’s actual goddamned meat thumb as a measurement.

            Maybe it was, before the king’s body parts got involved. But by standardizing on a what was supposedly the king’s body parts, you got THE BENEFITS OF STANDARD MEASUREMENTS.

            They had a standard cubit rod, in the palace or temple or wherever, and you would use that shit to calibrate everyone’s everyday-use measuring sticks. Remember: people are saying that it was dumb and ego-driven for the measurements to be based on the king’s body. But, to make it abundantly clear, THE STANDARDIZATION WAS THE USEFUL PART OF THE WHOLE THING.

            The idea of a forearm-length and a finger-length became axiomatic and abstract. The important part was that it was a standard unit that everyone could rely on. It was the same from one end of your kingdom to the other, and you didn’t have to worry about one guy’s arm being shorter than another guy’s arm, and so your building comes out crooked.

            I’ll say it again, to be super-duper-incredibly clear: it’s unfair and idiotic to be like “HAHA, IMAGINE BEING SUCH A DUMBHEAD THAT YOU WOULD USE A KING’S ARM TO MEASURE STUFF,” but then turn around and praise the metric system for the wonders of standardization. You can see the ancient world’s standardization either as “tyrants made the people use their system” or “someone invented standard measures, and that’s why the Egyptians could build so much awesome shit.” The latter is correct.

            As I have said a couple times in other comments, the real genius move was deciding to base the new standard units on the king’s body, in the first place. I’m certain it was NOT the actual kings who had the idea, but whoever it was realized they could use the power of the king for everyone’s benefit.

            If someone had come up with the concept of a standard cubit and just shopped the idea around, everyone would have been like “cool, that’s great” and then fucking ignored them.

            But some massive-brained motherfucker went to the king with the idea. This did several things:

            1. It got the royal family to fund the creation of the standard system. Funding is good. You can’t have a new system without funding, and the king was the guy with the funds.

            2. You need a safe, well-maintained, centrally located place to store the precious original calibration cubit rod. The king has one or more of those places. They’re called palaces, government buildings, and/or temples. Those places are made to be secure, yet accessible for people who need to get official shit done. Absolutely perfect places for making new rulers from the calibration rods.

            3. When people get a delivery of new rulers that are based on the king’s forearm, they are VERY unlikely to say “cool, whatever” and refuse to use them. That could be seen as rebellious, rude, or impious. So you get people to ADOPT your new system of standardization.

            This shit is fucking genius. It delivered a huge percentage of what we think of as the benefits of the metric system, thousands of years before the goddamned metric system.

            Yes, there are genuine innovations that came along with the metric system itself, and as the SI system has been refined, over the last couple centuries. But that journey STARTED with someone deciding to use the king’s body parts as a standard.

            Nobody should ever use “haha, it’s so dumb to use measurements based on a long-dead king’s meat parts” as some kind of CONTRASTING example. That makes no sense. That shit WAS the beginning of standardization. It’s not the opposite of the metric system. It’s the progenitor of the metric system.

            • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I’m not deriding the genius science-coup of appealing to royal ego, or pretending that there’s a desiccated thumb we’re using as a standard.

              They changed in 2019 from physical reference ‘blocks’ for the shared weakness as all the other systems that have a ‘master’ calibration unit - whether that’s the SI kilogram or a cubit, or the goddamn kings arm. If the ‘master’ calibration unit changes, that introduces imperceptible drift.

              This becomes even more important for actual science - say your scale manufacturer calibrates against the standard ‘master’ measure last week, but your prior lab scales are older. Or apply that across different countries even - they all calibrated against the ‘master’ standard, but minute changes between years or decades looses the authentic standard of X. Dust, temperature, damage, etc all can very slightly throw off the consistency

              • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                That’s all totally valid.

                My pet peeve is when people talk about the old king’s-body-part systems, as if they are the dumb old opposite of the new, logical metric system. That’s not just false, it’s ludicrous. Ya know, because the one system grew directly out of the other. They were never actually in opposition, as concepts. The SI progenitors just wanted everyone to be on the same standard, worldwide. And for that standard to be more perfect, more consistently defined, and continually improved upon.

                In truth, the real step forward is the stubborn persistence of the international organizations that have worked across language barriers and times of international conflict to keep the system going.

                And, of course, it has to be remembered that all that effort wasn’t worth doing, until very recently. Up until we had really fast mail (and then telegraphy/telephone) systems for communication, extremely interconnected and fast trade routes between essentially all nations, and extremely advanced cooperation among cross-continental scientific organizations, it didn’t really make sense to try and put everyone onto the same unit system.

                In other words, the SI system came along when worldwide conditions were ripe for it to prosper. That’s not taking anything away from the aforementioned grit and determination and labor that the SI founders and current organizers have done. I’m just saying that it’s incorrect to characterize the situation as “gee, people were soooooo simple and dumb and gross, before these amazing French dudes saved us from our primitive inches and feet.”

                And yet that’s how people talk about it. Like I said, it’s a pet peeve.

                EDIT: Also, I think a lot of people fail to recognize that all the powerful nations in the pre-SI world had completely functional systems of standard measurements. It’s just that those systems didn’t function outside of their specific nations/empires. Again, there’s too much of a hyper-grandiose narrative, as if these French giants came along and invented ALMOST THE WHOLE CONCEPT OF MEASURING STUFF, overnight.

    • Starb3an@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I work 3-11pm. That’s literally my sleep schedule and I love it. My only complaint is after COVID, nothing is open past midnight or 24/7

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Right there with you.

      So yesterday I was told that we were doing forced ten hour shifts for the next three weeks. And do I vote to start at 8, 7, or 6 everyday?

      Holy fuck none of the above! It sucks that later starting jobs pay shit in my experience.

  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Blame the society and suffer all your life.

    Or find a job with a flexible schedule, or in a timezone behind you. Find hobbies that are late in the evening, or move to a country where people casually have dinners at 10pm (all mideterrian Europe).

    Sent at 2am in my timezone

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      find a job with a flexible schedule, or in a timezone behind you.

      This, 100%. I work for a gig remotely that’s an hour behind me and let’s me shift my schedule with a bit of freedom as needed to get my tasks done, and it’s awesome. For example, this morning I didn’t even get up until 8am and was still able to do my morning stuff and get to work at a reasonable time.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fun facts for night owls:

    I’m sorry, there are no fun facts. It was a lie, it’s actually terrible. You just zombie through life unable to function without health destroying levels of caffeination _

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even more fun is adding sleep apnea on top of being a night owl. Sleeping less AND sleeping poorly.

    So “lucky” caffeine exists.

  • at_an_angle@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I like waking up a 0530 to get to work by 0700.

    That’s not a joke. I seriously love it.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      430 to be at work by 6, but I usually wake up closer to 230 or 3. It’s a good feeling to disable your alarm before it harasses you.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wonder what will win out. nature or nuture when, if I retire. decades of corpo clock getting me to wake up to an alarm every morning or my natural inclination.

  • Summzashi@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Since you’re pretending this is real; Why don’t you just pretend it’s night during the day? Seems like an easy fix.