Microsoft has started rolling out a.i. to its Windows Operating System for PCs. This “feature” pretends to make it easier to find documents on a computer.

What they should have done is create a reverse index for document retrieval by contents keyword. That proven technology has been around for decades, and doesn’t use a.i.

Microsoft’s tendency to force a.i. unto users of its Windows operating system poses significant threats to privacy and the safety of corporate secrets.

For those of us who have a business to protect, what operating systems help safeguard privacy?

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You can turn off a lot of it with group policy. I would also do testing on the desktop so you can stay ahead of the antifeatures.

    Edit:

    I like this line:

    Recall won’t take snapshots of InPrivate web browsing sessions in Microsoft Edge

    • Ænðr@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Windows 10 equivalent, Timeline, got discontinued in 2021. At this point in time it is unknown whether Microsoft will retrofit Recall into Windows 10. Knowing Microsoft it is safe to assume they’ll try anything for profit.

  • retrospectology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    At first glance, the Recall feature seems like it may set the stage for potential gross violations of user privacy. Despite reassurances from Microsoft, that impression persists for second and third glances as well. For example, someone with access to your Windows account could potentially use Recall to see everything you’ve been doing recently on your PC, which might extend beyond the embarrassing implications of pornography viewing and actually threaten the lives of journalists or perceived enemies of the state.

    Despite the privacy concerns, Microsoft says that the Recall index remains local and private on-device, encrypted in a way that is linked to a particular user’s account. “Recall screenshots are only linked to a specific user profile and Recall does not share them with other users, make them available for Microsoft to view, or use them for targeting advertisements. Screenshots are only available to the person whose profile was used to sign in to the device,” Microsoft says.

    This sounds very much like on of those claims that has an invisible “for now” attached to it. It’s always going to be a slow roll out with these kinds of things.

    • RenardDesMers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Can’t wait to see 3rd party software trying to use this to “improve your experience” while using their app.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I personally think that downvoting your comment is a more proper use of the downvote button. But the real purpose is to downvote stuff that violates the rules or is immoral in general (such as promoting terrorism or excessive data collection). And btw I don’t think downvote raids are allowed

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Downvotes are not “I disagree with this person”

          A downvote used properly is to bury misinformation, low effort posts, off-topic posts, and as you say - violation of rules or attacks on others.

          This is an example of a low effort post that can easily be misinformation because it cannot be verified.

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            You are right. What I meant by my reply is that the person I replied to forced their opinion. But still downvoting low-effort is not great imo. Not everyone wants to spend an hour finding the source or writing a 10 paragraph explanation

            • swooosh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              You suggest that a low effort question that is read by hundreds or thousands is better than quickly searching the internet?

              • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I suggest that people should stop being toxic and excessively judgeful. I’m not saying that low effort posting is good

        • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          But the real purpose is to downvote stuff that violates the rules or is immoral in general

          Says who? Since when? wtf

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s my personal opinion against their personal opinion. Nothing more. My reply was meant to show that the person aggressively forces their unproved opinion

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This sounds a LOT like the plot of a terrible 90’s movie that was thinly veiled to portray MS as a mini-surveillance state, with some murder thrown in. I’ll try and find it.

    Edit: Released in 2001, it was ‘Antitrust’. I remember it being bad, but not good-bad like ‘Hackers’

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That sounds familiar. I was thinking of one called something like Sawfish? But maybe Antitrust is what I’m thinking of.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        ‘Swordfish’. I don’t even know what in the hell that movie was supposed to be, but it was basically Hugh Jackman as Wolverine as “Hacker”, but just filled with ridiculous nonsense.

        Great episode of ‘How Did This Get Made’ going over it. Worth a listen.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I thought that surely it couldn’t be that bad. But…

    “Recall uses Copilot+ PC advanced processing capabilities to take images of your active screen every few seconds,” Microsoft says on its website. “The snapshots are encrypted and saved on your PC’s hard drive. You can use Recall to locate the content you have viewed on your PC using search or on a timeline bar that allows you to scroll through your snapshots.”

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      So it’s a security camera pointing at your screen, but with AI involved.

      Honestly though, this sounds like the kind of thing you could hack together with a shell script and OCR on a *NIX system in an afternoon. Cronjob to take screenshots and run them through OCR, keywords to a database. Add hooks to your window manager to take additional screenshots on relevant events (change desktop, application opens/new window on screen, etc.).

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Encrypted”

      It must be secure if it is encrypted. The problem with the Microsoft secret storage is that they key is on the disk.

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        For individuals, yes. For organizations, no. Orgs who know what they’re doing use a HSM for their data encryption. Thus the title of this post is inaccurate.

        But from the consumer side, I am absolutely never going to buy a “Copilot Plus” device, whatever that is.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been using Linux for near enough a quarter of a century as my main desktop and I haven’t regretted it yet.

    Linux today is plenty easy to use today for a non-technical audience, runs with less resources, has global communities, comes in your language and it’s free.

    • satanmat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hear you.

      Being able to search and read was the hardest part (read as not at all difficult)

      99.9 % of my computer usage is FF and libreoffice.

      Other than (maybe) initial setup there is nothing stopping “your mom” from being able to have Linux as a daily driver.

      Microsoft is for some reason $$$$ shooting them selves in the foot they seem hell bent on making windows unusablely crappy. Oh look enshitification.

      • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Case in point, my late 50s father was recently fired from his job of 36 years. They told him not to return the ancient E series thinkpad they had given him as an email checker, but wouldn’t give him a password to be able to use it. After finding the bios wasn’t locked I chucked Debian on it for him and he’s been using it for months to send applications with only a light introduction libreoffice and some minor tinkering with system settings to make it feel more familiar.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Microsoft is for some reason $$$$ shooting them selves in the foot they seem hell bent on making windows unusablely crappy.

        They’ve been doing this shit since Windows 8 and haven’t lost any users so I don’t think “shooting then selves in the foot” makes sense.

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My problem is, even if it’s encrypted, only local blah blah blah, if your Microsoft account is compromised, what then?

    I worked on account services for msft. The amount of people with compromised accounts is astounding.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You linked to a shitty website that blocks hardened browsers instead of the article on Ars. Downvoted.

    Please re-post with a link to the actual article.

  • Shrank7242@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ars Technica reports Microsoft will add AI to Windows, to steal your corporate secrets

    Look, I think it’s a dumb feature and a dumb direction for Microsoft to head so deep into (AI and the whole Copilot branding). But that title is a downright lie and not supported by the article at all.

    The article refutes your title in the 5th and 6th paragraph. Did you link to a reddit post rather than the article to make your title more clickbait? Come on, that doesn’t foster actual discussion. You can do better than that.

    • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      To quote Microsoft themselves on the feature;

      “No content moderation” is the most important part here, it will happily steal any and all corporate secrets it can see, since Microsoft haven’t given it a way not to.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No content moderation means it ISN’T reading the screen.

        It’s screen shots saved to your hard drive just like when you hit the print screen key in Arch. It’s a stupid feature but saying MS is stealing everything because of this feature makes no sense.

        • Successful_Try543@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I know, but NK politically isn’t that far away from PRC.

          I recall a statement from an article I’ve read several years ago on the presentation of Will Scott, a professor who has been in NK, at 31C3 2014.

          Als sich Scott Root-Zugang verschaffte, fand er ein für Normalnutzer unzugängliches Programm, das die komfortable Einrichtung verschlüsselter Datenträger erlaubte. “Das ist interessant, wenn ihr einen AES-verschlüsselten Datenträger braucht, an dem die NSA garantiert nichts manipuliert hat”, scherzte Scott.

          When Scott gained root access, he found a program inaccessible to normal users that allowed the convenient setup of encrypted data carriers. “That’s interesting if you need an AES-encrypted data carrier that the NSA is guaranteed not to have tampered with,” joked Scott.

          • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I know, but NK politically isn’t that far away from PRC.

            After the Covid lockdowns there is a saying in China:

            We thought that North Korea is our past, but now we know it’s our future.