• makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cash: continues existing, providing simple, privacy-perserving, anonymous payments for the population

      Governments and CBDCs: “And I took that personally”.jpeg

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Governments and CBDCs: “And I took that personally”.jpeg

        You dropped this: Hands you a tinfoil hat

      • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You go into a store and purchase a tool. Like an axe. You pay with cash.

        You use the axe to commit a crime. You are a suspect, and the police issue a photo to the public.

        The store clerk recognises the photo and contacts the police.

        The police review the footage and watch you paying with cash at the store.

        wOw So AnOnYmOuS sO bRaVe

        • Knuschberkeks@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          in your example thenproblem is the purchase method, not the payment method. Same thing would have happened if you payed with crypto.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      “And I took that personally”.jpeg

      Would any rich cryptobros like a copy of that jpeg but instead pay 100k for it so you can say you “own it”?

      /s