• makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Bitcoin uses <1% of global electrical usage, mostly from renewables since miners must chase the cheapest electricity and renewables at off-peak times are it. They turn off during times of peak demand since they can’t afford higher-priced electricity. How do you think that compares to banks? Remittance services? All the infrastructure used to move money from point A to point B? It takes energy and even more valuable: human capital to move value around.

    For reasons why Bitcoin isn’t a huge waste of energy and why it actually helps stabilize grids, increase efficiency, decrease electrical costs, and subsidizes the provision of new renewable infrastructure, see https://endthefud.org/

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Considering how much of a nieche Bitcoin still is: 0.5% of global energy usage is one hell of a lot of energy!

      In what universe is proof-of-work more efficient than conventional banking systems?

      • Dymonika@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Let’s talk about banks.

        Let’s talk about all the vaults and their maintenance, the security guards, the Brinks armored cars, all the tellers, wire transaction-handling, and so on and so on.

        No, gee, hmm, they’ve never calculated how much a vast, global expense all of this is per second.

        Maybe they want you to keep believing that it’s more efficient.