• Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nintendo has hundred of games that people are willing to pay massively inflated prices to play, but Nintendo would rather sue emulation projects.

      • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nintendo shouldn’t be allowed to litigate against people they accuse of cutting into sales of not-for-sale games. They know there is a demand for their old catalog but do not release it for sale, forcing a market for piracy.

          • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s the combination of suing for sales that do not exist because they choose not to make those sales. I can’t type it any slower, man.

            • otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t like that Nintendo can sue people for something I don’t think should be illegal. So what THEY do should be illegal instead!

              Is that what you’re getting at? Lol