• FrankTheHealer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The man speaking in this clip is Nilay Patel. Hes the Editor in Chief at The Verge.

    He also used to be a lawyer before moving to journalism full time. So he knows Bullshit when he sees it.

    I used to think that The Verge were just a bunch of Apple zealots who couldn’t even do a pc build video properly. They’ve come along way since then. Reddit would be absolutely insane to try and take on something like The Verge.

    Side note , Nilay also has a podcast called Decoder where he interviews the heads of companies to get an idea of how they run and what their goals are. Its a pretty good show and I reccomend it. The one where Nilay takes on the head of Substack was hilarious

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Verge has been covering the shit out of the Reddit death spiral and I’m so here for it. Good for them.

    • Boz (he/him)@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same, their coverage has made me feel way less terrible about all of this. Just knowing someone is out there calling Reddit on their BS makes it easier for me to accept that Reddit is no longer a safe place for me and move on.

    • SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For real. My brother is one of those people who is like “they aren’t gonna die from this so why should I care blah blah blah”. He thinks if protesting won’t have the immediate impact that people want then those no reason for it to happen

      • Murais@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Effective protest means accepting going without and inconvenience.

        In an instant gratification society, that is anathema.

  • memex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can anyone explain to me, please, how is this good (financially) for the reddit investors? I mean, I ran from reddit since I only accessed it from sync. Didn’t really care for the ‘politics’. Now I get here and see there’s a lot more to it than just the shut down of 3rd party apps (which I understood as a financial decision). If money’s the motivation for all of this, how is it financially healthy?

  • AwkwardPenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This just amazes me. It seems as if their blinded by power. Actually thinking they’re the true and only Frontpage of the internet.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spez here thinking that the content hosting is more important than content generation. Reddit’s value to the community or advertisers is a result of the users, not Reddit Inc.

      • SaucyGoodness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean to be fair, I imagine when communities were in blackout things were looking dire. I haven’t been to reddit since, but I imagine things are pretty much back to normal? So it’s clear he can sort of spit on the reddit userbase how much he wants. People will still come back.

        • Candelestine@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Noooo, it has not returned to normal at all. When the protestors left, a flood of other people came in to take their place. It was enough to create a noticeable shift in tone. I would now describe reddit as a whole as barely left-leaning. Almost every sub moved a couple notches noticeably rightward.

          It has cancer. Prognosis not good, when monetization was the root cause.

          • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Uh, if what your saying is true, that sounds like an absolute victory for Spez. He never wanted good communities, he wanted communities he could market to. Having the idiot right wing that buys Chinese hats that says MAGA is absolutely the audience he wants.

            In fact, if you’re all correct and the old social media is just straight going to the right wing and the left wing goes underground to techie sites like Lemmy, their voices will get magnified. Which is already happening with bud and Starbucks. Oh we are fucked…

            • Candelestine@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Thing about the internet is the spaces are not set. You can’t conquer a country like you can in real life, because none of the space actually exists. It’s all numbers of users, because there is a finite number of them, and they can only hang out and contribute in so many spaces.

              They move into one, another shrinks. People come here, this one grows. That’s all. Think of it less as some kind of strategy game and more of fluids flowing and interacting in a complex system.

              • DekkerNSFW@lemmy.fmhy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure, but some places do have more influence on the public discourse than others. Lemmy will remain relatively uninfluential until it becomes more user-friendly, and/or more well-known. So any left wing stuff here is going to have less of an effect than it did on Reddit or other such places, for now.

  • n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’ll no longer comment on hearsay, unsubstantiated claims, or baseless accusations from The Verge. We’ll be in touch as corrections are needed.

    Setting aside the ridiculousness of this position, the statement also doesn’t make sense at face value, right? I think I understand what they’re trying to say, but aren’t those two sentences in conflict? Isn’t getting “in touch as corrections are needed” literally making “comment on hearsay, unsubstantiated claims, or baseless accusations”?

  • Freeman@lemmy.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean. My account has been a daily driver for the better part of 17 years. The name is original enough that if I went a week or so on an alt I would get requests for takeover from others.

    I haven’t been on since it all started. And I won’t close the account. Just let it sit.

        • Aasikki@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Gosh I HATE when I I stumble upon a reddit thread from Google when trying to solve a problem or something, and the comment which may have been the solution is removed or edited by one of those redact bots.

  • z3n0x@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t understand how people can still use Reddit and ignore all the ickiness.