Kobolds with a keyboard.

  • 4 Posts
  • 1.01K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle





  • I’m not familiar with nor am I equipped to comment on the natalist PoV, but I will comment on your argument:

    Gun violence isn’t even in the top 10 leading causes of death in the US. You’re more likely to die in an auto accident or to cancer or heart disease or diabetes or a number of other things than due to gun violence. If you’re trying to present a serious argument here, you might want to consider actual statistics.

    Edit: To be clear I’m not saying gun violence isn’t a problem. According to the CDC, there were 46728 gun-related deaths in 2023, but 58% of those (27300) were suicides, so really, mental health is a greater risk than gun violence. If your argument is “Gun violence is out of control and therefore natalists are hypocrites” or whatever, there’s so many other things you could have cited as things that should be addressed that would have made the point better than gun violence does.



  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.socialtoComic Strips@lemmy.world90's
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    5 days ago

    They started investigating him as soon as he started downloading that MP3. Did some reconnaissance around the house, got some surveillance intel, consulted a judge and a few expert witnesses, then commenced the on-site op and apprehended him when it was about 90% complete. (That’s about how long it took to download MP3s in the 90s.)




  • I was going to about say codify laws for them not to be messed with, but even codified laws can still be messed with. There must be a new way to instill laws that not even Congress can touch and fuck with. That no President after this one can touch. That no Supreme Court of any kind can touch.

    This absolutely should not be a thing. Imagine if the founding fathers had done this to codify e.g. slavery in this manner.

    Instead, we have the constitution. The closest thing to what you’re describing is a constitutional amendment. It’s not immutable, though (as evidenced by the fact that a constitutional amendment is a thing that can actually happen).







  • The problem isn’t content, it’s engagement on the content. Folks complain that niche communities have no engagement, just a bunch of posts by a single person… but it feels like 95% of the time, if I comment on those posts, there’s no reply, not even from the OP, and that discourages further posting.

    If you’re willing to engage on everything you post, I don’t see the harm in it, but at that point, why even use a bot? Why not just find content you like (or have the bot notify you of content), then post it yourself as an actual human?


  • Even if ads were a thing, they would be instance specific, unless they just took the form of posts advertising things (much like Reddit has) which personally I find to be toxic as hell. How would that money make it to content creators?

    Personally, I’d prefer to read posts from people who want to post them because they have something interesting to share or something they want to discuss, rather than people who are trying to maximize engagement because engagement = income. There’s plenty of other places to go if you want to be fed that kind of content.

    I think the sweet spot was 20-25 years ago when we had special interest forums with tight-knit communities around specific topics. It would be nice to get more engagement on Lemmy in niche communities, but I’d argue the way to achieve that is to go to other places where that content is posted, and share links to content on Lemmy, as a way to spread the word. Part of the problem there though is recognition, and if people see links to 20 different lemmy instances, they won’t associate those with lemmy as a whole, they’ll see it as all disparate things, and I’m not really sure how to solve that.