• PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Similarly, I feel like they did a great job in Horizon: Forbidden West. A lot of the animations are rote, sure, but then there’s facial expressions, like Kotallo thinking about Zo’s abilities, that are just amazingly human.

    Gaming has stepped up the production in recent years, and the standouts are obvious.

    • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Saying “gaming has stepped up” while praising the most over-hyped, bland-ass open-world action series in recent history doesn’t lend much credibility to your comment.

        • SoggyBread@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with you. It hit a good niche that hasnt been beaten into the ground yet. It had great world building, acting, story and soundtrack

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Horizon hit a niche that hasn’t been beaten into the ground? An Ubisoft style open world game with far too many collectables and garbage to waste time?

            • theragu40@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not treading new ground from a genre standpoint.

              But the combat is a style that isn’t really very common in open world games, and the commenter you are replying to specifically was talking about the story, characters, and world building…all three of which set Horizon apart from other games, IMO.

      • harmonea@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Calling DnD bland always strikes me as funny. It’s bland compared to most modern fantasy for the same reason Seinfeld is bland compared to most modern sitcoms: it’s one of the the foundations upon which most of the rest of what we’ve consumed since its inception is built. We’ve seen all the innovations upon its formula, so going back to the original can feel lacking if you don’t bother to think critically about why it feels that way.

        The important thing is that even without all those innovations, they nailed the source material and created the richest experience they could within its boundaries. If it’s not for you, it’s not for you, and that’s fine - no game is for everyone. But it’s a pity you dismiss it so flippantly, and I hope one day you can grow to see what’s executed well in a project even when its end goal isn’t to your tastes. Or just grow out of trolling, whichever applies. I’m not going to pick that apart.

          • harmonea@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, you might be right. That’s even odder to me then; I haven’t played any of the Horizon games myself, but I find their setting premise fascinating. Is it so poorly executed?

            If I misunderstood, my bad, but I’ll leave it since there are people who rant about BG3 in a similar direction.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I have to say that I played Horizon: Zero Dawn, and after the first couple hours it felt very samey. Basically a Ubisoft open-world game with slightly better movement and combat. Haven’t tried the new one, but I don’t think any open-world will ever really catch me again like Elden Ring did.

              • harmonea@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That’s a pity. Still, the setting (time period/tech levels/world population composition etc) is worth taking away as something good that people can learn from, I hope, even if they messed it up so badly.

              • theragu40@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It took me several hours to get into HZD, but once it hit its stride it really hooked me. The opening few hours are quite weak, IMO. It takes that time for the story to start to reveal, and for the more deliberate pace of combat to make itself apparent.

            • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I personally haven’t played Horizon myself; but from what I saw if it, it doesn’t look poorly made; it just looks by the numbers. Over the shoulder “cinematic” open world game with that Sony trope of the protagonist telling you the solution to a puzzle upon seeing it.

              If my impression is accurate I would compare it to Quake II or Blue Beetle, if you are already a fan of Sony’s style of games you’ll most likely love Horizon, if you don’t like that kind of game then there isn’t much Horizon can offer you.