“My sense is that many enterprise WordPress administrators will think twice about continuing to use the software under these circumstances,” said IDC Research Manager Michele Rosen. “It’s such a shame to watch a leader in the open source community repeatedly sabotage his own project.”

“At this point, I have real concerns about the impact of Matt Mullenweg’s words and actions on the overall image of open source software,” she added. “Even if he feels that WP Engine’s actions are unethical and the court is wrong, his actions are clearly having an impact on the WordPress ecosystem, including his own business. It seems self-destructive.”

  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    it’s still frustrating how much is being lost though from our collective knowledge, especially with the dismantling of the internet archive. web 2.0 was definitively a mistake, and it’s one that almost everyone fell for

    • bobalot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The old internet was the peak.

      Mostly static Web pages and thousands of BBS forums was the greatest.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Why was Web 2.0 a mistake and what does that have to do with centralization?

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        web 2.0 was the generation of web technologies defined by a lower barrier to entry for web posting thanks to centralized platforms provided by for profit corporations. think facebook, reddit, twitter, youtube

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            right. it was the corporate centralization and profit motives. that was the main focus of my ire. but how the corpos captured the net was by investing in lowering the bar of interactive participation. it’s great that more people got to participate, it’s not great that it came at the cost of participation benefitting corporations, not participants