• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    So if it’s possible then it’s possible for the government to have that done by people that are capable.

    That would tell me then that it’s more than likely not a national security concern, it’s a profit concern. Apparently Zuckerberg was a major actor pushing for this ban as it is, he supposedly kept harping on the security aspect. :/

    • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      If the code were static and unchanging, sure. But it’s not possible to conduct such analysis every time an update is issued on a continuing basis, without fast becoming a hundreds of millions of dollars or more program.

      So the better question isn’t whether it’s possible — it’s whether it’s feasible. And the answer is no, it’s not.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I think if pirates working on their bedroom PCs can release cracks and keygens only days after a game or other piece of software is out, then the government can probably keep up with app updates.

        • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It’s a lot easier to scan for very specific code behavior than it is to scan for “anything useful for espionage”. And that still wouldn’t solve the question of what their server software is doing or where the collected data is ending up.