Those are some generalizations you’re making. Saying “no one” in the title was a bit of an exaggeration, no? There are plenty of people who don’t buy single-use items. Lots of people work from home, including me and my wife. We don’t have a truck. Most people aren’t landlords and thus aren’t in a position to control rest prices.
tragedy of the commons. People impacted arent in position to change it, people in the position to change it aren’t impacted.
One day we will realize individual actions wont cut it and we need to unite against those burning our world instead of quibbling about who recycles more.
Go on. What should people be doing? What inconveniences should people be tolerating, that they are not currently?
deleted by creator
Those are some generalizations you’re making. Saying “no one” in the title was a bit of an exaggeration, no? There are plenty of people who don’t buy single-use items. Lots of people work from home, including me and my wife. We don’t have a truck. Most people aren’t landlords and thus aren’t in a position to control rest prices.
tragedy of the commons. People impacted arent in position to change it, people in the position to change it aren’t impacted.
One day we will realize individual actions wont cut it and we need to unite against those burning our world instead of quibbling about who recycles more.
deleted by creator
I fear that rich people may have to be slightly less rich, truly a horrifying inconvenience.
OP isn’t talking about the rich.
deleted by creator
You said “no one” wants to be inconvenienced. It was clearly a jab at the common Joe, not the 1%.
Clearly, it wasn’t.