I tried out most (if not all) of the music players on flathub, but I always end up going back to Rhythmbox. It’s so simple, lightweight, got just enough features (for my use case) and blends well with GTK Desktops (I mostly use Gnome and Cinnamon) and it looks so clean in my Nord theme 😆

How has your experience with Rhythmbox? do y’all got any alternative you think everybody should give a try? I personally think Elisa is a close second!

  • Chemo@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    2·
    20 hours ago

    I really really don’t get why you just can’t organize your music in plain old folders with rhythmbox. Not Playlists, not Meta data. Just folders. Ist it that exotic? Is it that hard to implement?

    • merci3@lemmy.worldOP
      1·
      18 hours ago

      My musics are organized by metadata, playlists AND folders. I currently got about 1980+ songs locally, and felt like I needed all of these methods to keep them organized and good looking

      • Chemo@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
        1·
        15 hours ago

        And is there any way to play songs by folder with rhythmbox yet? Haven’t looked into it for a while.

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    4·
    1 day ago

    I used it on Mint. I liked it. I use Strawberry now because it can bypass software decoding and output audio directly to my DAC.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    2·
    1 day ago

    I really just want a media player that:

    1. Has good media library support based on tags (lots do)

    2. Has ReplayGain support (lots do)

    3. Lets me have an album art panel bigger than a thumbnail (and here is where so many options fall short, including Rhythmbox)

    Deadbeef seems to be the closest due to its good customizability, but the plugin which allows for actual media library capability is apparently Mac-only, for some unfathomable reason.

    Gonna be stuck with Foobar via Wine for a fair sight longer, I think.

    • AugustWest@lemm.eeEnglish
      1·
      1 day ago

      ~~Clementine does all those things. ~~ I may have mistaken what you are asking for. Are you wanting a cover larger than a thumbnail in the “catalog” section?

        • AugustWest@lemm.eeEnglish
          1·
          1 day ago

          Got it. My initial thought was you wanted to see the cover when it was playing. This makes more sense now. I don’t use covers in the catalog part because my library is way too big. I would never be able to scroll through them all!

  • Leaflet@lemmy.worldEnglish
    8·
    2 days ago

    I just went on a journey looking at different local music players.

    Just tried Rhythmbox. It’s not terrible, but not great either. It looks very bare bones.

    Of the ones I’ve tried, I like Elisa the best. I spent a ton of time getting HQ artwork and quality metadata on my files and Elisa really shows that off. Rhythmbox barely shows any artwork. I just have two complaints about Elisa. First, Qt apps just don’t feel right in Gnome for various reasons: fonts are often too thick, icon contrast is bad, and Qt theme is weird for non-Breze. It also has weird scrolling behavior: it has forced scrolling smoothing and acceleration.

    Runner up is Sayonara. It’s Qt based, but actually feels decent in Gnome. Overall I like the UI more than Elisa, but unfortunately it doesn’t handle showing my library as well. Artwork is duplicated (it shows albums multiple times if songs in them have different years) and some artwork is inexplicably missing.

    • merci3@lemmy.worldOP
      2·
      2 days ago

      I really enjoyed Elisa too! It looks modern and does a great job at showing off metadata 😁

      But I still sticked with Rhythmbox because of: 1- it’s GTK based, and I’m currently on Gnome (the reason why when using KDE, I stick with Elisa) 2- I kinda did not understand how managing playlist in Elisa works? Maybe I missed something, but Rhythmbox just seemed more simple and direct to the point with that.

      But yeah, I do agree with you that Rhythmbox really lacks in the “showing album covers off” space. But in my personal usage, I don’t tend to be looking at the UI of the music player on the desktop anyway, since I usually just play music on the background while doing other stuff.

      On mobile (android) on the other hand, I’m enjoying Gramophone for not only showing larger covers, but also matching it’s own Material You colors to the respective music you’re playing, it’s neat :p

  • azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    5·
    2 days ago

    It literally hasn’t changed even a tiny bit since I first saw it in 2006 :)

    I currently use Strawberry - a well maintained fork of the old Amarok player before they redone the UI for KDE 4. It does what I care the most:

    • Tree view collection with artist -> album grouping
    • Files view
    • Lyrics
    • Tag editor
    • Queue
    • Last, but definitely not least - gapless playback
    • AugustWest@lemm.eeEnglish
      1·
      1 day ago

      Fork of Clementine you mean.

      I am still using Clementine. Strawberry is missing some features.

  • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    7·
    3 days ago

    Rhythmbox has been my main music app for over 15 years now. Every now and then I’ll check out other options but I always end up back after a couple days.

    I do wish they would give the UI some attention. Nothing major, just a few visual tweaks to bring it inline with modern Gnome (the alternative toolbar plugin is really close)

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      1·
      2 days ago

      Same, I just really want the automatic playlists feature, but no other music players that look nice on gnome seem to have that. Pretty much all newish players are so minimal

  • geoff@lemm.ee
    11·
    3 days ago

    Absolutely classic music player. The iTunes 1.0 UI pattern, which was pre-enshittification. To my eyes, I still don’t think I’ve ever seen a more overall efficient and descriptive way of browsing a local music library.

      • WeAreAllOne@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        2 days ago

        I think I’ve read somewhere that there still is maintenance but can’t find it now. In any case Cantata works perfectly!

    • flo@lemmy.mlEnglish
      2·
      2 days ago

      Same here. Nothing even comes close, at least in my opinion - it’s comparable to foobar2000.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    7·
    3 days ago

    It still can’t sort or browse by album artist, which makes it a real pain to use. You have to apply a patch and compile it from source to make it usable.

  • onTerryO@lemmy.caEnglish
    4·
    3 days ago

    I just looked up the initial release, it was in August 2001. I don’t remember the first time I used it, but it was probably 20 years ago. Still remains my favourite for the reasons you mentioned.

  • Mx. Nichole@sh.itjust.works
    2·
    3 days ago

    I use it occasionally but mostly I use terminal players like cmus or musikcube (aliased to mcu, because… geek)

    Mostly I live in my shell with zellij and do basically everything on cli. Even web browsing (allbeit non graphical) can be done with stuff like lynx or w3m. And for fanfiction that’s fine.

    • merci3@lemmy.worldOP
      1·
      3 days ago

      Just out of curiosity, what advantages do you think cli apps have for this sort of application? Is the experience snappier?

      • Mx. Nichole@sh.itjust.works
        2·
        3 days ago

        Honestly I use an app called zellage and I like being able to put my music player(cmus) and artwork ripper(cmus-art), and usually a visualizer (wtf can’t I remember it’s name).

        There’s no particular advantage so much as my personal preference for staying on keyboard and off mouse. I have everything bound to key chords that I’ve more or less memorized so it’s a quick ctrl+t n for new tab ctrl+p v move pane down , etc etc and I can do all of it more or less by feeling.

        It’s largely an aesthetic preference, but It’s also that I have a slow system. So I can keep ram use down. 2nd gen core i3 problems (shrugs)