• samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    Definitely getting a Steam Deck instead. I was waiting for confirmation of the ridiculously high price.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      For $50 less, you get a similarly capable machine in terms of specs but more comfortable to hold, with an immensely larger library, and an operating system far more respectful of your authority to do what you want with the machine you bought.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most importantly for someone with limited funds like me, you can sideload games onto it.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’d encourage you to utilize those limited funds legally by buying games on deep discounts, if you were implying piracy, but even legitimately, being able to sideload all the old PC games you have is a massive plus. GOG and Epic give away great games for free on the regular, and an Amazon Prime subscription has recently been filled with some bangers that you get to keep via both of them.

      • rbits@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I don’t think we know the specs yet, it might be way more powerful than the Steam Deck. I agree though that the Steam Deck is a better value considering the amount of games and their prices.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Digital Foundry has been looking at what tech could feasibly be in this thing for a long time now. They’re going to be very comparable in performance.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      “$450 is an insanely high price for a new console, so I’m going to buy a $400 2 year old console instead.”

      It’s a 60Hz vs 120Hz screen, and it’s got true 1080p resolution. It’s certainly on-par with the Steam Deck in terms of performance and performance per dollar. The price isn’t ridiculous by any stretch.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        A $400 2 year old console that I can sideload games onto, yes. Nintendo’s strength has been “weaker hardware, cheaper price” since the Wii. Now they want to price themselves alongside Sony and Microsoft? No thanks.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        “$450 is an insanely high price for a new console, so I’m going to buy a $400 2 year old console instead.”

        Sure. But it’s also a choice between a library that will forever cost $70 00-$90.00 per game, and a game library infamous for game sales so good that an average player cannot finish their library because the seasonal sales are too good to pass up.

      • llii@discuss.tchncs.de
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        The price isn’t ridiculous by any stretch

        The thing for me is: The Switch is only a closed-down console. You can only buy games through the nintendo store. The Steam Deck is open. I can play my older games, even physical games via external optical drive, on my Steam Deck.