• Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yup! Both are leeches on society, but one is sucking from the jugular and the other is sucking from an extremity. That being said they are both sucking the same blood.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I really have no empathy for the scalper problem.

      Don’t go to the concert.

      If anything the artists could charge more, seeing as some people will already pay scalper price. They’re doing they’re audience a favor by charging so much less than they’re willing to pay.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The argument isn’t meant to make scalpers seem worse, it’s to demonstrate how illogical it is to treat houses the same way as tickets

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Scalpers aren’t even bad.

          Just having some self-control and refusing to buy at what you see as an unreasonable price would make their entire business model invalid.

          If someone is willing to pay $3,000 for a Taylor Swift ticket, or $1,000 or more for an early PS5, that’s what they’re worth.

      • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Umm cause I lack generational wealth? I’m in my 30’s and almost every person I know that owns a home has done so with the help of their daddy or mommy’s money. 🥱

        • LegionEris [she/her]@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          See, this is what gives scalpers the moral edge over landlords to me. Scalpers are largely working class people using money they earned to do something arguably unethical. Is it kinda lame? Are they losers? Yeah, and again it’s arguably unethical. But are they complicit enforcers of generational wealth and power divides? Are they, as a group, one of the primary forces siphoning wealth and power from the poor and working class to those who already have wealth and power? Nah. They’re just uncreative opportunists. Scalpers create a gulf of immorality between you and recreation to their own benefit, not between you and necessity to the detriment of society at large. So yeah, scalpers>landlords in my estimation.

          • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Was just drawing parallels, i wholeheartedly agree with your sentiment that scalpers arent anywhere near as bad as landlords in the grand scheme of Capitalistic exploitation. Its just a great analogy of how you can most of the time turn a safe profit if you have the cash to flip a commodity. The issue is housing shouldnt be treated as a commodity.

      • ShranTheWaterPoloFan@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is easy, if you can get a mortgage.

        I currently pay less than $2k a month on my mortgage. A 1 bedroom apartment near me is about $1.8-2.5k and a 2 bedroom is $2.5-3.5k a month. People aren’t lazy and not buying houses because it’s so fun to live in an apartment, they are doing it because they can’t get a loan.

        The only difficult thing about buying a house is the hours of paperwork and surprise costs that make no sense.

      • Licherally@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        And if you own a house that is being flooded, just sell the flooded house and move you fucking idiot.