• Johanno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why though?

    I mean the only reason I could think of is that the number of sites which do not support Firefox increases. So I always need Chrome to get some websites working.

    What did Firefox that Vivaldi does better?

    • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      What did Firefox that Vivaldi does better?

      So far:

      • No AI slop
      • Lower CPU usage
      • Broader set of extensions (old Chrome + Chrome V3 both supported)
      • Nicer interface with actually configurable sidebar
      • Configurable keybinds for everything
      • Mouse gestures

      But as I say, I’ve only been trying it for a few days, and there are several others I want to try before I settle on a permanent replacement.

      • Johanno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Ok I get your point, but basically a Firefox alternative like libre wolf would work for you too

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I find that Chromium derivates do perform much better as long as a Wayland+Nvidia combo isn’t freaking them out.

      It’s usually not a huge deal on fast desktops though.