• MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I was thinking maybe the Luddites/weavers might be the first job loss victims but you’re probably right.

      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        In bronze age, there were no jobs. People did what had to be done collectively and had a lot of leisure time

        • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think you might mean quite a bit earlier than the bronze age? I’m not an expert by any means but my understanding is that the Egyptian bureaucracy and a tax system meant that slaves could build the pyramids in the bronze age.

          • CybranM@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            My understanding is that the “built by slaves” theory is a bit outdated. The pharaoh had access to a massive population and outside of harvest stations could be engaged in construction efforts. Slaves were very likely part of it too but not the majority of the workforce

          • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, it’s more complicated than I have painted it. There was stratification, kings and slave and all in between. But there was no wage labor. You are either paid for the product or you’re enslaved but you’re not temporarily unemployed or lose your job. You don’t lose your job to automation, your just done earlier

  • janNatan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why is the lady almost the same color as tom? I don’t remember this being a furry show.

    • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      If I recall, the ‘maid’ was a feline character of a black mammy stereotype. But I haven’t seen this cartoon since the 80s, for obvious reasons.

        • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Because it was blatantly racist. I only saw it on a VHS of various cartoons from the 50s-60s that my southern grandparents probably bought at a truck stop not knowing what was on it.

          There was also a cartoon where the main character was an explorer being chased by charicatures of indigenous natives that wanted nothing more than to poke him with spears and cook him in a pot.

          • realitista@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Yep this is what is gen X kids grew up on in the '70s. And we watched the same ones at least 30 times each every weekend. So you’ve got to give us credit for any progress we’ve made despite this programming in our childhood.

          • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            ah yes, yes, ok

            Do you mean that specifically (the maid character), or was there more to it ?

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    And in the end it still couldn’t outdo Tom. Just like how a certain modern “invention” will never be abkentk fully outdo professionals.