If Mexico’s stats are much closer to the rest of Central America, then it makes much more sense to count it with them, so the outlier of North America is better seen.
I mean the “narrative” is the reality that the US (and I assume Canada) is hopelessly dependent on car infrastructure. If Mexico isn’t as dependent then it makes perfect sense not to group them in the same category.
It’s weird to call the category NA (excl Mexico) rather than just saying US+Canada. But that’s not cherry picking.
‘skew the data’… with facts? about North America?
As opposed to cherry picking data to present their preferred narrative?
If Mexico’s stats are much closer to the rest of Central America, then it makes much more sense to count it with them, so the outlier of North America is better seen.
I mean the “narrative” is the reality that the US (and I assume Canada) is hopelessly dependent on car infrastructure. If Mexico isn’t as dependent then it makes perfect sense not to group them in the same category.
It’s weird to call the category NA (excl Mexico) rather than just saying US+Canada. But that’s not cherry picking.