Is it worthwhile to try to get mods to combine them? It just seems like a bit of a waste when trying to grow a community and its split in two.

Or is this what the fediverse is supposed to look like?

I read before somebody said that we might be able to combine similar communities at some point but don’t know if that’s true.

    • Briongloid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My suggestion on GitHub was to let instance admin create a local /g/ grouping, with the freedom in how they utilise a /g/ group.

      Some people argued that they should be able to make it per account, like a multireddit, but the point was for new and general users having easier access to broader fediverse content.

      The instance admin would only need to do some legwork at first, then they could add to it as they go along. The barrier of entry for new users finding which communities outside of their instance is substantial.

    • Mane25@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What would be the difference then between subscribing to, say, 10 different communities separately, or a group of 10 communities?

      • JoeCoT@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If there are 5 different instances with the same community, to subscribe to all of them you have to go find them all.

        If kbin had a feature to combine them in groups like this, when you went to subscribe to one version of the community, it could let you subscribe to all of them at once. Without having to hunt them down.

  • I think so, I’ve found out quickly that the instance can add a lot of context as the instance tends to be the primary setter of the overall theme or topic, and the communities are just where they intersect. It will be interesting to see which ones get popular and which ones don’t.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    this gets asked a lot. Yes, the whole point of this platform is to be decentralized. Nothing stops you, or anyone, from following 5 different communities on the same topic. The advantages are many. Basically each instance will be able to mod with/apply different rules to their communities, they will attract different crowds (even if they overlap a lot) and they will have a different style. If one goes down, which is likely in these platforms, or if say an instance cannot be sustained anymore, or if one of the instances defederates your instance, or whatever- not all is lost. You still have all the other communities to follow.

    there is a popular saying that goes, ‘‘don’t put all your eggs in the same basket’’.

    • FlayOtters@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apologies if this is a repeat question. I’m not entirely sure if there is a way to search in Jerboa for similar posts but I don’t think there.

      • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The search function should function the same way as the search function on the official web interface. That means however, unless you’re searching the url of a specific community, it can only search for communities, comments and posts on instances it has cached. If it hasn’t had a member visit a community at least once, it won’t know it exists.

        I recommend browse.feddit.de to search for communities, and for newly created communities, you can search through the posts in !newcommunities@lemmy.world

        There are many other places to look, you can find multiple lists of communities that migrated from Reddit with a quick google search.

        • FlayOtters@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just saw that some apps do have a search function already. I’ve been using Jerboa and it doesn’t have one yet (for posts/comments that is).

          Thanks

  • RosalieMorgan@readit.buzz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think that at the moment many communities are too fragmented. A lot of them seem to be a single person. There is a sweet spot regarding size, and that number is different from community to community. I wish people would avoid making duplicates if they didn’t have at least one other person ready to join them though.

  • FinalBoy1975@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s a good thing to have more than one community devoted to a topic. I have already discovered that I don’t like this or that community on this or that instance but I like another community on another instance dedicated to the same or similar topic. People have different styles and preferences even though they have similar subjects in common. It’s like having different supermarkets or clothing stores. Some like to get their jeans at The Gap. Others prefer Levi’s. Giving users more choices is good in my experience. It used to be this way in the days of forums and usenet news groups. I think if you’re not used to it you will get used to it. It’s like shopping around for a good class at college or looking for the right pair of jeans that fits you the right way.

  • Mane25@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, it’s a great thing.

    In the old days of forums there were multiple forums for popular topics, so if you didn’t like one or didn’t agree with how it was moderated you had many more to choose from. It was usually friendly and you got to know all the regulars in a forum.

    Next we had centralisation which lead to massive forums, resentment built up against moderators, everyone was faceless and had no sense of community, and it all basically turned in to a competition for attention.

    Now we have decentralisation, we can have lots of manageable size communities again - it’s great.

    • SoNick@readit.buzz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Mane25 Yeah, but it’s the pits for the smaller communities I used to use reddit for. The local-ish one had at most 300 people online at a time and most of them were lurkers. Split that into smaller groups and there isn’t enough critical mass in any one smaller group to make the communities work.

      @FlayOtters

      • Mane25@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It wasn’t a problem for forums, for smaller interests there’ll be fewer forums, it’ll sort itself out.

  • RosalieMorgan@readit.buzz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think that at the moment many communities are too fragmented. A lot of them seem to be a single person. There is a sweet spot regarding size, and that number is different from community to community. I wish people would avoid making duplicates if they didn’t have at least one other person ready to join them though.

  • (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s exactly what happened with reddit, I think it’s better to have more than one, worst case scenario you only sub to one and if it goes down there’s a quick alternative.

    Personally I sub to both and if an article repeats no big deal I just move on

  • sean@murray.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve found that similar communities on different instances can have VERY different experiences in terms of the community and attitude. I know I’m generalizing, but I feel a lot of Lemmy.world instances are more negative and hostile than similar instances on beehaw.org. Personally, I’d rather they stay separate. That way I can be more precise on dialing in the experience I want.