• spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You clearly haven’t. People don’t just sit at home and collect UBI. People are clearly addicted to consumerism, and that requires having a job. People also enjoy working.

      You don’t have a critical mind and you aren’t discussing this in good faith because you clearly think if UBI was enacted that people would all become lazy and sit and home and do nothing. That you think this way shows everyone that you HAVENT done any research or reading on UBI.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most wouldnt, but a significant percentage would. I think enough that you cant discount those people from any discussion on UBI.

        In Australia we have social security and I know people who are 3rd generation jobless and they dont usually supplement their social security with a casual job, its usually drug dealing or other crime.

        Im all for a realistic discussion on UBI but you have to examine how its going to impact all strata of society. Including the ones who will use the lack of any meaningful motivation to do better or be better people.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I promise you that if it comes down to having to sacrifice some work getting done as a result of there being UBI, the market is not going to trim “food production” from the set of projects getting done. It’ll be more like “pumpkin spice ASMR videos” that get the axe.

          Like, you agree the market is a medium that transmits needs between people allowing them to negotiate effort ratios for different projects, no?

          So given a market and a bunch of people who need to eat, how does that result in food not getting produced? It doesn’t make sense. Hunger is a motivating force. Hunger is an incentive.

          Receiving UBI doesn’t remove the incentive to eat. And if there’s a food shortage then there’s profit to be made off producing food. The market still operates with UBI involved.

          • Delphia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Do your research”

            I’m not going to waste my time jumping on google and citing stufies that have showed that it isnt some magical cure all for the worlds Ills because you arent going to read them, or take my opinion onboard because its easier to claim that my sources are biased, I’m wrong and you’re still right.

            • Marketsupreme@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wait. So you’re going to develop an opinion entirely on feelings, while the guy you’re replying to developed an opinion based onr research? That is WILD

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This video goes over multiple studies and meta analyses that show that, in every single case where it’s been tried, social spending, including UBI, always pays for itself in the long run, and UBI specifically never leads to people just not working. It leads to people finding jobs more their style. And y’know something? The “undesirable” jobs still get done, because there are genuinely people that want to do them.

          • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

            This

            Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

            I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

      • Throwaway@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you met people? Get out of your bubble. Fucking hell, thats the daftest thing Ive ever heard, and I got an A in gender studies. (It was an elective, and I wanted to challenge my view that gender studies was bullshit, sue me)

        • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There you go showing the class that you DIDNT do your homework.

          There has been UBI implemented for studies in multiple countries around the world and overwhelmingly they show that people still choose to work.

          Fuck off back your conservative bubble.

        • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. Most that I’ve met work hard to improve their lot, even the few I know who were born rich enough that they don’t have to. Just because you’d be a lazy sack of shit if you could get away with it doesn’t mean everyone else would.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, the fact we have the modern world at all is evidence motivation doesn’t stop just because basic needs are met.

            If that were all the human drive had in it, that is where we would be.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right. If no one works, people starve.

      There’s no reason to assume nobody would work under UBI though.