inari@piefed.zip to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 16 days agoOfficial Linux position on LLM usage in kernel developmentlore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up195arrow-down13 cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up192arrow-down1external-linkOfficial Linux position on LLM usage in kernel developmentlore.kernel.orginari@piefed.zip to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square43linkfedilink cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.ml
minus-squarevandsjov@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·15 days agoDidn’t call everyone an idiot, but he’s not wrong, humans makes mistakes all the time
minus-squarebountygiver [any]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·15 days agoYes, but allowing floodgates of AI work to come in it lowers the bar and allow more mistakes to flow in. Just because humans make mistakes doesn’t mean we are ok with shipping mistakes
minus-square𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 days agoHe’s not saying that, he is saying LLMs are a tool and can therefore be used. He’s not saying AI generated code gets a free pass into the kernel just because an LLM says it looks good.
Didn’t call everyone an idiot, but he’s not wrong, humans makes mistakes all the time
Yes, but allowing floodgates of AI work to come in it lowers the bar and allow more mistakes to flow in.
Just because humans make mistakes doesn’t mean we are ok with shipping mistakes
He’s not saying that, he is saying LLMs are a tool and can therefore be used. He’s not saying AI generated code gets a free pass into the kernel just because an LLM says it looks good.