1984 is REAL! I knew it, they use kids as an excuse to appease both Christian lobbyists and lazy parents. Now, that can’t be dismissed as a conspiracy theory as it has materialized. You can hijack MSM telling the truth with solid evidence (in order for you to not be dismissed as a conspiracy theorist) disproving the “think of the children” shield debunking the government’s claims on security & exposing their hypocrisy.

Both demographics who use the rhetoric of “kids should touch grass” suddenly jump into “BAN SM FOR -16!” like WTF does that have do with anything? That links into the implementation and enforcement of AV laws which the true intent is enabling espionage on the people quashing any dissent & tramples people’s civil liberties that ancestors fought for now being swept under the rug replaced with tyranny.

AV hasn’t worked and won’t as proven (VPN usage is skyrocketing and accept crypto anticipating that normal payment methods are surveilled), like with prohibition back in the 1930’s: there always be a form of circumvention. They want to make 1984 a reality it seems but most are either sheep or lack critical thinking into trying to avert any fascism or elite dictatorship. I’ll say this: empires rise and fall through the ages.

In order to disprove and debunk propaganda: one must require solid proof debunking the lies. Like if you can somehow prove to the people that AV isn’t to “protect kids from harmful content online” with the truth being on “we’ll arrest you for any post via SM or political dissent towards the state”, you must become like anonymous (the group) just to resist never revealing your true identity to anyone, EVER (including your family).

The reason is: the tyrants may use family as collateral on forcing you to come forward (it happens with countries under dictatorships towards defectors of the regime, if the subject refuses to take accountability, their loved ones pay the price). That is a possibility that can occur under a fully mass surveillance dystopia years after AV is treated as the norm and a stepping stone rather than a hinderance.

The issue lies on the tyrants not committing the same types of atrocities equivalent to that of Auschwitz, rather theit goal is to surveil, detain and censor dissidents without enacting genocide (as in a mass surveillance dystopia no one dies since it’s not the holocaust, more on facing inconveniences with paradigms that’ll be locked under digital ID). I think that’s the part separating “Agenda 2030” over “Nazi tyranny”.