By what logic does failing to stop an attack on foreign soil imply you should keep surveilling your own citizens?
Logically isn’t this a stronger advice of “if you cannot stop an action with hundreds involved and multiple countries, what’s the point of all your surveillance?”
By what logic does failing to stop an attack on foreign soil imply you should keep surveilling your own citizens?
Logically isn’t this a stronger advice of “if you cannot stop an action with hundreds involved and multiple countries, what’s the point of all your surveillance?”