I don’t think there is an earlier option for less money anymore but could be wrong.

  • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does ‘tax the rich’ help solve this issue…? Sure, there’s not a large ‘next generation’ to help support our aging society, but most all of our issues sprout from unchecked capitalism and the ultra rich hoarding wealth.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the US, social security is a tax on poor people earning less than~$160k. That’s the bottom 90% of earners.

      The top 10% of earners collect about half of the country’s personal income. Each of them does have to pay SS tax on the first $160k of earned income, but clearly there’s a huge pool of income that doesn’t pay into social security.

      • Nurgle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        To that point SS is fully funded till about 2035 and then can pay out approx 75% of benefits after that. Removing that $160K cap would pretty much solve things.