Unfortunately, the United Corporations of America loves milking kids for money because they hope and bank on kids annoying the shit out of their parents to spend money on whatever is being marketed towards them
Seriously, I’d rather just ban overt advertisement. Labels on buildings and stylings? Sure, what ever, peacock your actual location all you want. Have tons of info and material available for people? Definitely. Have catalogs for people to look through where you layout your stuff and make it look nice? Sure. Search engines? Duh. But straight up ads? Nah. Such a waste of time. Let peoples’ interest drive the views again.
If you take a massive step back from the world of commercial advertising, it seems almost bizarre how readily people let advertisements proliferate. If an alien species popped over to Earth and took a look at our interaction with advertisements, what were they think about it? By their very functionality, words alone are enough to hijack our thoughts (“Don’t think of an elephant”), let alone words chosen by well paid committees.
But you’re right, if I must be exposed to ads, I prefer the ones that I look at, and not the other way around
The most basic argument for ads that I’ve heard is that they can inform consumers of options they would not otherwise be aware of. Not unreasonable, competition can only exist if people are aware that alternatives exist.
But that’s not how ads are used or the psychology and research put behind them. And the modern incarnation of capitalism as infintiely growing profits above literally all else puts too much skin in the game for companies to make “purely informative” ads. Ugh. Fuck ads.
Unfortunately, the United Corporations of America loves milking kids for money because they hope and bank on kids annoying the shit out of their parents to spend money on whatever is being marketed towards them
It’s why toys and sugary cereals run alongside cartoons. We should just ban advertising toward children.
You can tell this is one of the good “think of the children” policies, because I don’t think anybody would be opposed to it applying to adults too.
Seriously, I’d rather just ban overt advertisement. Labels on buildings and stylings? Sure, what ever, peacock your actual location all you want. Have tons of info and material available for people? Definitely. Have catalogs for people to look through where you layout your stuff and make it look nice? Sure. Search engines? Duh. But straight up ads? Nah. Such a waste of time. Let peoples’ interest drive the views again.
If you take a massive step back from the world of commercial advertising, it seems almost bizarre how readily people let advertisements proliferate. If an alien species popped over to Earth and took a look at our interaction with advertisements, what were they think about it? By their very functionality, words alone are enough to hijack our thoughts (“Don’t think of an elephant”), let alone words chosen by well paid committees.
But you’re right, if I must be exposed to ads, I prefer the ones that I look at, and not the other way around
The most basic argument for ads that I’ve heard is that they can inform consumers of options they would not otherwise be aware of. Not unreasonable, competition can only exist if people are aware that alternatives exist.
But that’s not how ads are used or the psychology and research put behind them. And the modern incarnation of capitalism as infintiely growing profits above literally all else puts too much skin in the game for companies to make “purely informative” ads. Ugh. Fuck ads.