• MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, but ammonia chemically burns the eyes, lungs and skin of everyone that comes into contact with the resulting gas in a wide radius.

      • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah that’s a problem. However, it might make more sense on balance if we have big nuclear power plants generating clean ammonia while off peak electric demand.

          • Railison@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ammonia is wayyyyyyyy easier to store and contains more hydrogen. Pity about the environmental and health dangers

          • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You don’t have to store liquid ammonia under high pressure and it has a higher energy density by volume than hydrogen. Also, ammonia is already very useful beyond energy storage, such as for fertilizer. Maybe a hybrid system is the way to go, with hydrogen for smaller consumer applications and ammonia for larger industrial ones. I don’t know if there’s good way to produce ammonia directly by electrolysis yet, so the ammonia might still have to be derived from hydrogen anyway.