• woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think Apple’s terms are problematic.

    The VLC people had to contact many authors to relicense libVLC to LGPLv2.1 because it would otherwise not be compliant to Apple’s terms. Surely the details are documented somewhere.

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s because VLC took external contributions, and therefore couldn’t relicence the software by themselves.

      All of the Github authors seem to be part of the official dev team, so the organisation behind the app shouldn’t run into any permission issues unless they’ve messed up their paperwork.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s because VLC took external contributions, and therefore couldn’t relicence the software by themselves.

        “As I understand Apple’s terms, GPL code isn’t actually prohibited”

        No relicensing would have been required if your understanding was correct. That said, I have a slight headache and that’s why I’m not looking it up myself.