• Sybil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    it’s definitely exploitation. you just don’t like the connotation. they are being exploited for their blood just like a well is exploited for oil a mountain is exploited for minerals and forests are exploited for wood.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Exploit has multiple meanings, exploiting a resource and exploiting someone in an underhand or unfair way do have the same phrase to explain them. But exploiting a resource is obviously much different than treating workers unfairly.

      Verbs and nouns typically have different meanings for the same word, maybe time for an English refresher.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        mounds and greens have nothing to do with this. we are only using the transitive verb here.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m using it correctly. don’t be condescending. you might think it’s a fair exploitation, but it’s exploitation nonetheless.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        since you clearly went to a dictionary, you can see none of the definitions even mention “force”.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          There are other words in the definitions that mean the same.

          What do you think unfair and underhanded means….?

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            to be clear, my definition is correct, and you are objecting to the connotation of other definitions. this is very much your problem .