• simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Awesome news. Bless the regulators fighting back.

    As a result of the termination, Adobe will be required to pay Figma a reverse termination fee of $1 billion in cash.

    This does bring a smile to my face. Maybe companies will actually stop trying to mass acquire everything when there are risks involved.

  • NoiseColor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    As a designer that uses figma every day, I have to say…

    … I don’t care one bit. I have to subscribe and use Adobe software anyway, not only because everyone else uses them, but because that’s simply the best graphic software out there and I’ve tried it all. Not too mention that the full Adobe subscription, that you can usually get 50% off, is not that expensive anyway, compared to many saas that are buggy and just do one simple thing. So yeah, I don’t hate Adobe anymore, everyone is doing what they are doing and most of the software out there is complete garbage and even more expensive.

    • hswolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have to disagree with the “best software out there”.

      You said you are a designer, that you used It all and currently uses Figma right?

      Adobe has a Figma competitor, Adobe XD, and It seems you’re not using It, even though It should be better like you said.

      • NoiseColor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sorry, I thought everyone will understand that I’m taking about photoshop, illustrator, indesign, AE and not that every single Adobe product ever made is absolutely better than every single other product that has ever been made ever… Next time, I will try to be more precise. I deeply apologise

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I also have to subscribe to and use Adobe software but suggesting it’s less buggy and less expensive than other apps is delusional.

      The moment you try and do anything outside of basic image editing, Photoshop immediately shits the bed.

      It’s riddled with features that were half developed or half removed. Tried using any of the 3D stuff? It pops up a box saying “We’ve abandoned this and it probably won’t work, but go ahead and try because we haven’t properly removed it”. Using artboards? Probably not, since half the app seems to break with them, including their brand new features like Live Gradients that rearrange themselves when you save.

      Looking for a filter? Well there’s 2 places to look since they seem to have lost interest in the filter gallery half way through, then piled mediocre AI filters on top. It’ll be a slow search, since for some reason some popup windows take fully 3 seconds to open, probably due to their 4 different UI systems in various states of abandoned.

      Photoshop is widely used today because it was good 15 years ago. If someone hasn’t already creating a leaner, more stable, better designed, more ambitious piece of software, it’s only a matter of time until they do.

      • NoiseColor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Delusional? I’m sure you just mean to capture my attention, but you dont have to try like that.

        I’m not here to defend Adobe or praise their products. For the last 2 years I have done my best to get rid of them and finally, about a month ago I conceded and payed for the subscription again.

        Let me tell you, there is no software (none, 0), that can do half what photoshop can do and is less buggy. That doesn’t say, photoshop or any other Adobe product is not buggy and doesn’t have issues, it’s just a fact there is no competition.

        I say that completely confidently and with no delusion anywhere.

        • dreamer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          What I don’t understand about people who say things like there are alternatives and point to open source software. Like I understand that most people have used nothing but Adobe since forever, but have you even tried using alternatives for actual work? It’s a frustrating experience.

          • NoiseColor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes! It’s just not as good and more importantly, it’s not good enough. At first I thought it’s because I’m not as familiar, but no, they are just not set up as good as Adobe. That’s the bottom line. Why waste time.