• Seathru@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Worked well for me. Altho I’m just a small example. I run a mechanic shop where pay is directly tied to productivity, not time. About 6 months ago as an experiment, I started giving the techs off on fridays, making it mon-thurs. Turns out overall productivity didn’t change; they got more done per day on the 4 day work week. So it ended up being an extra day off with no change in pay. They’re happy with the longer weekend, and I’m happy with a day of peace and quiet to get paperwork done. I don’t plan on changing it back anytime soon.

    • Greens@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      You point out the “problem”. “Productivity” and “hours at work” are decoupled in your situation, but as a culture we generally don’t believe that to be true. We exalt the people that “burn the midnight oil” and “stay late to get things done” because we assume more hours equals more work getting done. Until we break that culture, a 4 day work week is not going to be widely accepted.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I disagree. 3 day. Im not kidding here. we had a 5 day when one parent was not working. Two adults working 3 days each is a 6 day work week for a family and we used to have 5.

  • ted@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve had it at my job for a year and a half, it started after the Great Resignation took like half of our good staff.

    The main problem is that it’s used as a scapegoat against any other improvement, e.g. hiring more folks, paying more wages, better benefits. Granted, I’d choose 4dww above a lot of those things, but it doesn’t feel nice that there’s a threat to lose it.