• pl_woah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Humans think real random isn’t random 🙃

    It’s wild but they see patterns

    • pup_atlas@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The problem isn’t that their random is biased or has rules, the is that it is entirely deterministic, to the point where it will play the same exact songs, in the same exact order for days. It’s as if shuffle just activates a hidden “shuffle” playlist that only updates once a week.

    • rush@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, computers physically cannot be random, they rely on logic

      • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        CSPRNGs are a thing…

        As are radioactive sources

        And there’s mathematical tests for whether something is random enough

        So no, computers really can do random xD

        • rush@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          CSPRNG literally stands for “cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator”. All randomness in computers is pseudorandom. Not TRULY random

          Radioactive sources for randomness aren’t really just put into your average household PC or phone either for obvious reasons.

          • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            A CSPRNG is more than random enough for a playlist xD

            Take it from someone who works in the field - computers do random well enough rotflol

            • rush@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s not what I’m doubting here. I was raising awareness to the fact that a computer physically cannot be truly random. I know that pseudorandomness is enough as we cannot perceive a difference easily.