• TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, that’s why they failed. They opted for really short sighted options and throwing money at it rather than actually trying to compete legitimately.

      • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sorry, didn’t realize we were in agreement haha. I wonder if network effects would kill any real steam competitor before it has a chance, and maybe that’s why Epic tried to capture that userbase first.

        • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Another issue is that Steam already does so much for both the consumer and developers. People got all pissed about their 30% cut (mostly because Epic told them to tbh) but Steam actually does provide a lot of services for games on the platform like Workshop. I guess they technically provide forums too but those are a hell scape and would probably be better off destroyed.