but that’s just your estimation of it. shouldn’t we give a TON of latitude when it comes to deciding that in a sub called “NO STUPID QUESTIONS”? or is your judgement the barometer for stupidity?
It’s not about “stupid” for me but about the amount of loadedness in a question. There are indeed no stupid questions - but there are stupid assumptions.
Even one answer from. OP in it’s often easy to see if they want to generate knowledge of search confrontation.
what exactly about my responses illicit the perceived notion that i’m upset? simply because i disagree with your poor ascertaition of what a sub called “no stupid questions” should entertain? perhaps more people should disagree with you so you get used to hearing “no”.
Most not upset people wouldn’t exert such an effort over someone else’s opinion on something so irrelevant as you have.
And it’s incredibly ironic that you should suggest I get used to people disagreeing with me when this entire conversation exists as a result of you having a problem with what I said.
But those aren’t stupid questions, they are questions very smartly crafted to imply a certain answer or legitimize a problem. Then they are not stupid, but smart. And often evil.
you mean like telling people how ‘you’ disregard some questions in a sub that’s supposed to be open to any and all questions because ‘you’ feel like ‘you’re’ too important to take them seriously?
but that’s just your estimation of it. shouldn’t we give a TON of latitude when it comes to deciding that in a sub called “NO STUPID QUESTIONS”? or is your judgement the barometer for stupidity?
It’s not about “stupid” for me but about the amount of loadedness in a question. There are indeed no stupid questions - but there are stupid assumptions.
Even one answer from. OP in it’s often easy to see if they want to generate knowledge of search confrontation.
a ‘loaded’ question doesn’t have to be malicious. Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
That is my estimation of it. That’s why I said it. You understand how this works, right?
Well, apparently you don’t understand what “no stupid questions” means. so…
You seem really upset. Maybe you should take a break for a while?
what exactly about my responses illicit the perceived notion that i’m upset? simply because i disagree with your poor ascertaition of what a sub called “no stupid questions” should entertain? perhaps more people should disagree with you so you get used to hearing “no”.
Most not upset people wouldn’t exert such an effort over someone else’s opinion on something so irrelevant as you have.
And it’s incredibly ironic that you should suggest I get used to people disagreeing with me when this entire conversation exists as a result of you having a problem with what I said.
Get your house in order, kid.
But those aren’t stupid questions, they are questions very smartly crafted to imply a certain answer or legitimize a problem. Then they are not stupid, but smart. And often evil.
you mean like telling people how ‘you’ disregard some questions in a sub that’s supposed to be open to any and all questions because ‘you’ feel like ‘you’re’ too important to take them seriously?
Well, mods could remove the downvote button if it’s not supposed to be used.
lol!