• EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is weird only in that if they are not going to socially separate, all this tells us is that they have decided to separate their assets. Is that worth announcing? Were we otherwise going to be alarmed if Sofie opened a new bank account in her own name?

    • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Ontario, you have to be separated (defined as living apart) for a year before you can get a divorce. There are exceptions for abuse and adultery, but this is the first legal step on the road to divorce. Whenever possible, it’s best to keep it as amicable as possible when children are involved. That can still include going on vacations together.

      • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Typically one will spell out the division of assets in a separation agreement. That can be done at any time. You can even write up such an agreement when you are at the peak of marital bliss if you really wanted, although it might be unusual.

        They seem to be happy to maintain a relationship, even if just for the kids, so there is no social division.

        Divorce doesn’t really mean much – other than allowing you to get married again, I suppose. It’s a pretty handwavvy concept to begin with.

      • voluble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In Ontario, you have to be separated (defined as living apart) for a year before you can get a divorce

        What the fuck? Actually? What’s the reasoning there? That seems unusual to me.