She’s rather proficient at both Portuguese and Italian. She has a bit of a hard time distinguishing mid-open /ɛ ɔ/ and mid-closed /e o/ in both (see: PT “história” and “adora”, IT “scuole”), so you can kind of guess that she’s a native Spanish speaker, but past that her pronunciation is clear and fairly easy to understand - to the point that you can even pinpoint which varieties she’s taking (conscious or unconsciously) as pronunciation reference:
- Portuguese - Paulistano for sure. She kept Spanish coda [ɾ] intact, but she’s raising the final vowels (even if not necessary).
- Italian - Northern-ish, urban. She renders /s/ as [z] (Southerners would use [s]).
Her Italian prosody sounds a bit off, but I can’t pinpoint exactly why. She also realised “specialmente” with /s/ instead of /tʃ/, but this sort of “slip” happens. (At least she isn’t hyper-correcting “caso” if, in case into “cazzo” dick, like the pope did.)
Her English shows a rather thick American accent (rhotic, tapping), but that’s kind of a given (she lives there IIRC).
Great comment. She effectively communicates in all those languages, which is impressive. Who cares about her pronunciation mistakes or her accent ! Still, your analysis is interesting to understand the roots of Latin languages and how subconsciously we tend to phonetically use our mother tongue phonetics when communicating using other romanic languages and dialects. It happens to me when speaking specially French or Italian that I cannot avoid but using the tonic syllable of my native language. I always say that, even is not a Latin/greek based language, I love how Swedish pronounce their English: in my experience, kind of trying to communicate efficiently and forgetting, as much as neutrally possible, about the accent. (To be said that later on I learnt that most Scandinavians also have a strong accent when speaking English). I guess that the question is if to be considered a proficient speaker of a specific language, do you need to loose all traits of a foreign accent?
subconsciously we tend to phonetically use our mother tongue phonetics when communicating using other romanic languages and dialects.
Yup. The “posh” word for that is transference; you transfer features from all varieties that you speak into each other. It isn’t exclusive to Romance varieties, it’s just that among Romance languages you can get away transferring more stuff (as there’s a good chance that the feature in question also exists in the target language).
This gets interesting in Shakira’s Portuguese, because she is not transferring a few Spanish features into Portuguese, even if she could theoretically do so, and still pass as a native. A quick example of that would be how she pronounces “determinante” with [tʃi], even if plenty Portuguese speakers would use [te] instead, as you would in Spanish.
I guess that the question is if to be considered a proficient speaker of a specific language, do you need to loose all traits of a foreign accent?
It depends, really. There isn’t a single answer. For some, full proficiency is to speak a language as native speakers would; for others it’s just about being able to communicate with other speakers (native or not) efficiently.
Personally I’d consider the Swedish speakers from your example as fully proficient, as long as they’re able to communicate what they want.
I think it’s impressive that she speaks them with that much confidence and she sounds like she put in the hours to learn each one. I just think that Romance languages like Portuguese, Catalan and most French feel like cheating for Spanish speakers and vice-versa, though. It’s not uncommon for us to learn those languages in a few months. Still, mad respect for reaching out to her fans like that.
I’m a Spanish speaker that is afraid of French. I cannot make any of those sounds.
What helped me was Michael Thomas’s method for learning French. I literally played the CD once back in college and most of it stuck because the grammar is similar to Spanish and he makes it easy to learn. French vocabulary is a bit of a guessing game but it’s easier once you get the hang of it. You should give it a try, it only takes like a couple of days of passive listening.
Are you exaggerating when you say a few months? Because based on my personal experience as a native English speaker who’s spent a combined ~14 years to study two languages (only one of which even stuck), I cannot imagine becoming more than “hooray I can occasionally pick out a word or two when watching the news!”-level of proficient in a new language after a few months, even with intense study.
Native speakers of a romance language are already at “occasionally pick out a word or two when watching the news” level or better for other romance languages, without having to study them at all. They simply share a lot of words amongst themselves. Becoming decently conversational in a few months is not an exaggeration.
redacted for privacy :3
She’s also a massive tax evader iirc. Fuck her
Harsh, her story isn’t exactly nefarious.
She lived in the Bahamas until she had her kids, then moved to Spain primarily to raise her kids for 3 years but still used the Bahamas as her primary address.
Spanish tax investigators were unable to prove that she lived for 183 days within Spain, which should have been the Spanish physical presence test to prove Shakira lived in the country long enough each year to owe Spain taxes, but they could prove that she definitively didn’t live in the Bahamas.
Shakira reached a deal with Spanish authorities to pay over half the amount of taxes they initially asked for, likely because they couldn’t even prove that she was in the country for the amount of time she would have needed to be in the country to be legally required to pay taxes.
She still paid over $8 million for three years of corrective taxes to Spain.
Oh so after getting pressure applied to her she paid half her taxes?
Half fuck her than, plus a bit of interest fuck for delaying the process.
Seriously that’s just rich people money hiding. Especially as the Bahamas are a well known tax haven.
No, not half her taxes, half the tax service’s estimate of her being in the country for the time there is no proof of her being in that country, even after going through her social media for location clues.
After being pressured to participate in a trial based on the physical presence test by a tax service that couldn’t prove she passed the physical presence test, she voluntarily paid over half of the taxes they were asking rather than undergoing the trial.
The tax service agreed, meaning she paid 100% of her tax obligation for those years she was under investigation for.
Lol, this guy’s mad for absolutely nothing that has any consequence to his livelihood. Sure, get mad about the Russian/Ukraine war, or Gaza, but some random person you accuse of tax evation…get a hobby. Happens everyday, little kid.
It’s not a random person, it’s one of the very rich of this world. Why do you defend a random celebrity from paying their fair share? Why is being mad about war good, but tax evasion bad? My opinion does little to affect either.
Tax evasion is stealing from the public. That affects me actually more than what Israel does in Gaza. Perhaps reevaluate your priorities before being needlessly condescending on the internet.
Yeah, nah. Get mad at rich scum.
keep going 🤤
